Shopping Cart -

Your cart is currently empty.
Upgrade to today
for only an extra Cxx.xx

You get:

plus This issue of xxxxxxxxxxx.
plus Instant access to the latest issue of 350+ of our top selling titles.
plus Unlimited access to 30000+ back issues
plus No contract or commitment. If you decide that PocketmagsPlus is not for you, you can cancel your monthly subscription online at any time. Auto-renews at $14.99 per month, unless cancelled.
Upgrade for $1.48
Then just $14.99 / month. Cancel anytime.
Learn more
Pocketmags Digital Magazines
AU
Pocketmags Digital Magazines
   You are currently viewing the Australia version of the site.
Would you like to switch to your local site?
Read anywhere Read anywhere
Ways to pay Pocketmags Payment Types
Trusted site
At Pocketmags you get
Secure Billing
Great Offers
Web & App Reader
Gifting Options
Loyalty Points

SCOTLANDS’ DEFENCE

A Most Responsible Proposition
The USS Arizona (BB-39) burning after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor

WHEN considering the lessons from the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, Professor Ron Spector of the George Washington University said, ‘American popular disapproval for going to war should not have allowed its government to fail in preparing for one.’ The 2014 independence Referendum White Paper therefore quite rightly incorporated a section on the defence of an independent Scotland.

However, those proposals were described by the UK’s Minister of Defence (at the time Philip Hammond) as being ‘a most irresponsible proposition’. I confess I think his analysis was correct though, as my previous article in iScot explained, the capabilities of the UK’s defences at that time were in decline after years of ill-conceived cuts and, in reality, it was more a case of the ‘pot calling the ketle black’. I don’t want to dwell on the failings of the 2014 White Paper but it’s important to clarify why I agree the defence proposals at that time were indeed ‘a most irresponsible proposition’ but from Scotland’s perspective.

Scotland inheriting well-used, secondhand assets would have saddled the country with significant, unbounded maintenance costs as most spares would have come from a single source - the remaining UK (rUK). Such a strategy would indeed have been a most irresponsible proposition – militarily, financially and with few benefits for Scottish businesses and employment.

In my view, Scotland should instead start with a blank sheet of paper and create the defences that would truly meet the country’s needs. Unfettered by the need to maintain and operate within the limitations of legacy equipment or aspiring to regain some long-abandoned ability to project power, an independent Scotland could create defence forces that would effectively defend our country, its assets and its exclusive economic zone (EEZ), whilst enabling us to play our part in the collective defence of Europe and the British Isles.

The obvious question of course would be: ‘How could we afford to create credible forces from scratch’? However, before looking at how that could be done, let’s consider Scotland’s strategic location, current defence trends and relevant lessons from recent conflicts, and see how other countries, including the UK, are mitigating their capability / funding gap. By shedding preconceived ideas that merely replicate how it’s always been done in the UK, and instead adopting some novel solutions that capitalize on the latest defence thinking and equipment trends, Scotland could create credible defences in ways that also boost its industrial base, jobs and civilian infrastructure. Defence can, and should be, an asset to the country and not merely a money pit.

During the 2014 independence referendum, Better Together set out to frighten Scots into believing a vote for independence would have severed all ties between Scotland and the rUK. They stopped short of saying we’d be thrown out of the Commonwealth but their message was clear, there would be a hard border and all trade between the rUK and Scotland would cease. In contrast, immediately following the EU referendum, in which Scotland had voted emphatically to remain, Nicola Sturgeon set a much more conciliatory tone by saying “Let me be clear about this, whatever happens as a result of this outcome [Brexit], England, Wales and Northern Ireland will always be Scotland’s closest neighbours and our best friends – nothing will change that.” As the close ties between the UK and its former overseas colonies show, it is possible for them to be independent and remain friends.

READ MORE
Purchase options below
Find the complete article and many more in this issue of iScot Magazine - February 2018
If you own the issue, Login to read the full article now.
Single Digital Issue
February 2018
$7.99
This issue and other back issues are not included in a new iScot Magazine subscription. Subscriptions include the latest regular issue and new issues released during your subscription.
Annual Digital Subscription
Only $ 3.25 per issue
SAVE
59%
Was $47.99
Now $38.99
Monthly Digital Subscription
Only $ 5.99 per issue
SAVE
25%
$5.99

View Issues

About iScot Magazine

iScot Magazine February 2017 100 jam packed pages of the best craic in Scotland from the only truly independent pro Scottish magazine.