This website use cookies and similar technologies to improve the site and to provide customised content and advertising. By using this site, you agree to this use. To learn more, including how to change your cookie settings, please view our Cookie Policy
Pocketmags Digital Magazines
AU
Pocketmags Digital Magazines
   You are currently viewing the Australia version of the site.
Would you like to switch to your local site?
Digital Subscriptions > Prospect Magazine > Feb-18 > Unorthodox diplomacy

Unorthodox diplomacy

Churchmen in Moscow and London are negotiating far more effectively than their governments. But are they doing God’s work, or Putin’s?

Shrewd politicians “don’t do God,” but perhaps wise diplomats should. Certainly, that is what the state of Anglo-Russian relations suggests. Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson’s chaotic visit to his Russian counterpart in December could hardly be counted a resounding success. Official state-to-state connections between London and Moscow are in tatters, as icy as during parts of the Cold War. But when it comes to communication between the countries’ religious leaders, a definite rapprochement is underway.

Patriarch Kirill made his first visit to Britain as head of the Russian Orthodox Church in 2016, when he came to celebrate the 300th anniversary of a Russian church in London. Things went well. Kirill was granted an audience with the Queen. Skilfully, he asked to see her as the head of one church visiting the head of another: the monarch is technically at the helm of the Church of England. She was, apparently, also eager to see him and they had a half-hour meeting at Buckingham Palace. Moscow must have been delighted.

Then, in late 2017, came the return visit. Justin Welby, the Archbishop of Canterbury, made a ground-breaking journey to Moscow for talks with Kirill, a trip I made with him. Its ostensible rationale was to underline the anguish of both churches concerning Christians in the Middle East, where hundreds of thousands have fled attacks and killings by Islamist extremists. It duly produced a call for world leaders to end the “mass killings, the barbaric destruction of churches, the desecration of holy sites and the mass expulsion of millions of people from their homes.” But it also did diplomatic work—acknowledging, indirectly, that Russia now plays a serious political and military role in the region, and that Russian Orthodoxy is the faith to which many Middle Eastern Christians are most closely aligned.

READ MORE
Purchase options below
Find the complete article and many more in this issue of Prospect Magazine - Feb-18
If you own the issue, Login to read the full article now.
Single Issue - Feb-18
$7.99
Or 799 points
Annual Digital Subscription
Only $ 6.90 per issue
SAVE
28%
$68.99
Or 6899 points
Monthly Digital Subscription
Only $ 7.19 per issue
SAVE
25%
$5.99
Or 599 points

View Issues

About Prospect Magazine

In Prospect’s February 2018 issue: John Naughton, James Ball, Yuan Ren, Hannah Jane Parkinson and Houman Barekat outline the ways in which our lives are controlled by big tech giants. Naughton argues that Facebook and Google have created a new “surveillance capitalism” in which they battle to grow user engagement of their products and monetise our lives for their own gain as they do so. The cover package also explores how “bots,” fake social media accounts, influenced the US presidential vote and the Brexit referendum as well as the effects of removing net neutrality in the US. Elsewhere in the issue: Samira Shackle asks what happens to ordinary civilians affected by Islamic State as they attempt to move back to their homes and rebuild their lives; Shahidha Bari asks whether we can continue to appreciate the work of actors, filmmakers and writers who have been disgraced; and Christine Ockrent profiles Michel Barnier.