AU
  
You are currently viewing the Australia version of the site.
Would you like to switch to your local site?
65 MIN READ TIME

The Decline of Intelligent Design

BY DONALD PROTHERO

Sunday, December 20, 2016 was the 10th anniversary of Judge John Jones’ decision in the landmark Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District case, better known as the court case that finally put intelligent design (ID) creationism on trial. It began in 2004 when creationists on the Dover, Pennsylvania, school board tried to sneak intelligent design creationist material from the Discovery Institute in Seattle, WA, into the school curriculum. The science teachers rebelled, as did a number of parents who became plaintiffs in the case. It was finally brought to trial on Sept. 26, 2005, and the proceedings lasted 40 days and 40 nights before the judge received the case for his deliberation.

During the course of the trial the witnesses for intelligent design creationism were repeatedly exposed for their bad science, and the documents introduced as evidence showed the clear imprint of having been recycled from older creationist documents. The most striking tampering was the discovery of different editions of the textbook Of Pandas and People. Early drafts were full of young-earth creationism, but when a federal case struck down creationism for the final time, the authors just did a cut and paste of a few phrases here and there to remove the references to God and creationism. In one place, the plaintiffs’ legal team exposed a telltale palimpsest: the phrase “cdesignproponentsists”, where the phrase “design proponents” had been clumsily and incompletely pasted over the word “creationists”.

The plaintiffs’ attorneys also brought together a stellar cast of scientists and philosophers and teachers, all of whom clearly showed that intelligent design creationism was just the religious dogma of creationism disguised by having the obvious references to God removed. The most damaging testimony, however, came from creationist school board members Bill Buckingham and Alan Bonsell, who were confronted with the many statements they had made in the past where they clearly stated their religious motivations for introducing intelligent design to the Dover schools, and perjured themselves by denying their creationist motivations during the trial.

Unlock this article and much more with
You can enjoy:
Enjoy this edition in full
Instant access to 600+ titles
Thousands of back issues
No contract or commitment
Try for $1.48
SUBSCRIBE NOW
30 day trial, then just $14.99 / month. Cancel anytime. New subscribers only.


Learn more
Pocketmags Plus
Pocketmags Plus

This article is from...


View Issues
Skeptic
21.2
VIEW IN STORE

Other Articles in this Issue


COLUMNS
The SkepDoc
VACCINATION IS ONE OF SCIENCE’S greatest accomplishments; vaccines have prevented
The Gadfly
MANY YEARS AGO, AS I WAS SITTING IN A courtroom
CONTRIBUTORS
Ástor Alexander is a figurative illustrator and painter. He specializes
SPECIAL SECTION WHAT MOTIVATES EXTREMISTS?
Once Upon a Time
WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO BE RADICALIZED? IN A RARE
Dealing With Islamism
AS REFUGEES FLOOD TO THE WEST IN UNPRECEDENTED numbers, and
Apocalypse Soon?
THE NATURE OF TERRORISM HAS CHANGED OVER TIME. The earliest
SPECIAL SECTION BRAIN UPLOAD
Mind Uploading
PETER KASSAN’S ARTICLE IN THIS ISSUE OF SKEPTIC argues that
Uploading Your Mind Does Not Compute
THE NOTION OF UPLOADING YOUR MIND TO a computer has
Virtual Immortality
VIRTUAL IMMORTALITY IS THE THEORY THAT THE fullness of our
ARTICLES
Paleoanthropology Wars
NEWS OF THE EXPLOSIVE DISCOVERY OF HOMO NALEDI in South
Charlie Sheen’s HIV Goat Milk Doctor
On January 29, 2016, HBO Real Time host Bill Maher
Massachusetts Mass Hysteria Cover Up
DURING THE WINTER OF 1692, FEAR SWEPT THROUGH the Puritan
Agony and Ecstasy
A PHARISAIC JEW NAMED SAUL, ZEALOUS FOR THE Jewish tradition
In Defense of Anti-Science
IS IT AUDACIOUS OR FOOLHARDY FOR SOMEONE RAISED on Erector
REVIEWS
No Sacred Cows
THOSE OF US WHO READ EXTENSIVELY IN the field of
JUNIOR SKEPTIC
MAN-EATING PLANTS
I’m Daniel, the Editor of Junior Skeptic. Today we’ll journey into jungles, push past tangled vines, and search for something sinister: trees that are said to eat human beings!
PLANTS VS ANIMALS
Plants and animals have been interacting with each other for
MONSTROUS PLANTS
You’re probably familiar with plants that move and fight in
THE MAN-EATING TREE
The search for rumored creatures such as Bigfoot and the
ROOTS AND BRANCHES
The New York World’s 1874 “Man-eating tree of Madagascar” was
MYSTERY SOLVED…?
It’s clear that the man-eating tree of Madagascar was a
VAMPIRE VINES
The man-eating tree of Madagascar was only the first hoax
PLANTS THAT EAT ANIMALS
There’s no sign that giant man-eating (or cow-eating!) plants exist