Shopping Cart -

Your cart is currently empty.
Upgrade to today
for only an extra Cxx.xx

You get:

plus This issue of xxxxxxxxxxx.
plus Instant access to the latest issue of 460+ of our top selling titles.
plus Unlimited access to 38000+ back issues
plus No contract or commitment. If you decide that PocketmagsPlus is not for you, you can cancel your monthly subscription online at any time. Auto-renews at $17.99 per month, unless cancelled.
Upgrade for $1.48
Then just $17.99 / month. Cancel anytime.
Learn more
Pocketmags Digital Magazines
AU
Pocketmags Digital Magazines
   You are currently viewing the Australia version of the site.
Would you like to switch to your local site?
Read anywhere Read anywhere
Ways to pay Pocketmags Payment Types
Trusted site
At Pocketmags you get
Secure Billing
Great Offers
Web & App Reader
Gifting Options
Loyalty Points
100 MIN READ TIME

Five Questions About Human Errors for Proponents of Intelligent Design

When Charles Darwin first proposed natural selection as the mechanism of evolutionary change, he provided many different lines of reasoning. One of them was that he and other biologists had observed striking examples of suboptimal design in nature. If a creator-God was perfect and designed the world and everything in it according to His perfect plan, how could poor structure/function be explained? If we view the natural world as the product of evolutionary forces, however, imperfection is not so surprising. Rather, examples of poor design reveal interesting things about an organism’s evolutionary past, and that’s the thrust of my new book Human Errors.1

Because courts in the United States rightly determined that creationism is a religious doctrine, not a scientific one, its proponents changed their approach, practically overnight, restyling their position as the theory of “intelligent design,” or ID. By focusing on the seemingly scientific principle of “irreducible complexity” and only implying a vague, unnamed “designer,” supporters of ID claim it as a valid scientific theory, not a religious doctrine necessarily. Notwithstanding the fact that vanishingly few scientists support this theory and that neither were the courts fooled by the semantic shift, ID has become the dominant expression of creationism in the United States and is supported by around 40 percent of the population.2 Support for ID is strongly stratified by age, with only around 25 percent of those under age 30 in support, and is finally beginning to decline after years of holding steady.3

Read the complete article and many more in this issue of Skeptic
Purchase options below
If you own the issue, Login to read the full article now.
Single Digital Issue 23.3
 
$7.99
This issue and other back issues are not included in a new Skeptic subscription. Subscriptions include the latest regular issue and new issues released during your subscription.
Annual Digital Subscription $22.99 billed annually
Save
28%
$22.99

This article is from...


View Issues
Skeptic
23.3
VIEW IN STORE

Other Articles in this Issue


Skeptic
Promoting Science and Critical Thinking
COLUMNS
Beware Stem Cell Clinics that Offer Untested Treatments
ARTICLES
Persistence of a Discredited Technique
A Cognitively Impenetrable Illusion
SPECIAL FEATURE THE JORDEN PETRSON PHENOMENON
The Jordan Peterson Phenomenon
It is well known that clinical psychologist, Dr. Jordan
Jordan Peterson and the Meaning of the Meaning of Life
SPECIAL SECTION SCIENCE & MORALITY
ARE GOOD AND EVIL IN SOME SENSE REAL? Or is one man’s
Is ethics ready for its ‘Copernican Revolution’? How to think like a scientist about morality
Among the more obnoxious things I’ve read in the wake
How Reason, Skepticism, and Compassion Can Win Hearts and Minds
Can science determine moral values? An Exchange with Michael Shermer, Massimo Pigliucci, and Kevin McCaffree
Utilitarianism and its discontents
Michael Shermer on Utilitarianism, Deontology, and
MY MAY 2018 COLUMN IN SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN WAS titled
SKEPTIC MICHAEL SHERMER RECENTLY PUBLISHED a column
HISTORIAN OF SCIENCE MICHAEL SHERMER AND philosopher
Ástor Alexander is a figurative illustrator and painter.
JUNIOR SKEPTIC
In the pages of JUNIOR SKEPTIC, we often discover that