BY MASSIMO PIGLIUCCI
(Originally published in platofootnote.org, https://bit.ly/2Js8v21)
YOU MAY HAVE NOTICED THAT I DON’T OPINE ON quantum mechanics. Or jazz. The reason for this is that—although I’m very interested in both topics—I just don’t know enough about them. Not enough to be able to offer an informed opinion, at any rate. So I sit back, read what other, more knowledgeable people have to say about quantum mechanics and jazz, form my own secondhand opinion, and try to avoid embarrassing myself by pontificating in public.
Apparently, my friend Michael Shermer does not follow the same philosophy. At least, not when it comes to the field of moral philosophy. He has recently published a column in Scientific American entitled “Does the philosophy of ‘the greatest good for the greatest number’ have any merit?” which starts out simply (simplistically, really) enough, and ends in a crescendo of nonsense. Let’s take a look.
After asking whether you would politically oppress a people for a limited time, if it increased the overall well-being of the citizenry, Michael explains that that’s utilitarianism, the philosophy started by Jeremy Bentham back at the beginning of the 19th century, often summarized with the slogan “the greatest good for the greatest number.”
READ MORE
Purchase options below
Find the complete article and many more in this issue of
Skeptic
-
23.3
If you own the issue,
Login to read the full article now.
Single Digital Issue
23.3
|
|
|
$7.99
|
|
|
This issue and other back issues are not included in a new Skeptic subscription. Subscriptions include the latest regular issue and new issues released during your subscription.
Annual Digital Subscription
Only $
5.75 per issue
|
SAVE
28%
|
|
$22.99
|
|
|
About Skeptic
SCIENCE AND MORAL VALUES
Jordan Peterson Phenomenon; Thought Crimes: Jordan Peterson and the meaning of the Meaning of Life; Special Section on Science & Morality. Getting Real About Right and Wrong; No, Being Religious Will Not Save You from Suicide; Lessons from Behavioral Science in a Warzone: How Reason, Skepticism, and Compassion Can Win Hearts and Minds; Moral Philosophy and its Discontents: Can science determine moral values? An Exchange with Massimo Pigliucci, Michael Shermer, and Kevin McCaffree; Facilitated Communication Redux: Persistence of a Discredited Technique; The Mystery of Elite Religious Scientists: A Cognitively Impenetrable Illusion; Five Questions About Human Errors for Proponents of Intelligent Design; The SkepDoc: Beware Stem Cell Clinics that Offer Untested Treatments; Junior Skeptic: Astral Projection