AU
  
You are currently viewing the Australia version of the site.
Would you like to switch to your local site?
75 MIN READ TIME

Science vs. Silliness for Parents: Debunking the Myths of Child Psychology

STEPHEN HUPP, AMANDA STARY, an d JEREMY JEWELL

Many ideas in child psychology have been largely discredited (Koocher et al. 2014). Unfortunately, parents and college students often have a hard time distinguishing between research-supported ideas and discredited myths. For example, in recent research, college students believed that Facilitated Communication (a pseudoscientific intervention) was more effective than Applied Behavior Analysis (a well-established intervention) as a treatment for autism (Hupp et al. 2012; Hupp et al. 2013).

While there is emerging literature on beliefs about child-focused myths, the existing research base continues to have limitations. First, many popular myths of childhood have never been examined with opinion surveys. Second, published opinion surveys are largely limited to focusing on ineffective interventions even though there are many other myths in child psychology such as those related to etiology (cause), typical development, assessment, and basic parenting approaches. Finally, previous opinion surveys primarily included college students. Although it is valuable to know the beliefs of students, it may be even more informative to gather information regarding parents’ beliefs. The purpose of this study was to assess the beliefs of both students and parents on a wide range of myths related to child psychology, and this is the first study to collect data regarding beliefs for the majority of these myths.

Method

Read the complete article and many more in this issue of Skeptical Inquirer
Purchase options below
If you own the issue, Login to read the full article now.
Single Digital Issue Jan Feb 2017
 
$4.49 / issue
This issue and other back issues are not included in a new subscription. Subscriptions include the latest regular issue and new issues released during your subscription. Skeptical Inquirer
Annual Digital Subscription $25.99 billed annually
Save
4%
$4.33 / issue

This article is from...


View Issues
Skeptical Inquirer
Jan Feb 2017
VIEW IN STORE

Other Articles in this Issue


Editor’s Letter
Letter from the Editor
The 2016 presidential election campaign—one of the most bizarre in
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
Bill Nye’s “Promote Reason, Prevent Climate Catastrophes: Let’s Get ’Er
NEWS AND COMMENT
Buzz Aldrin: What That Apollo 11 ‘UFO’ Really Was, and Why He Punched That Moon-Landing Denier
Buzz Aldrin is an American hero. The Apollo 11 astronaut
The Legacy of Fake Bomb Detectors in Iraq
After years of equipping important security checkpoints throughout Iraq with
Return of the Phantom Clowns
In August 2016, creepy clowns were reported in Greenville, South
Philosopher and CSI Fellow Robert Carroll, Creator of Skeptics Dictionary, Dies at Seventy-One
Robert Carroll, philosopher, CSI fellow, and prominent skeptic widely known
Psychic Arrested in Exorcism Scam
In September 2016, a New York–based psychic was arrested for
COMMENTARY
Skepticism, at Heart, Is Not Partisan
The United States has just completed the most contentious presidential
SPECIAL REPORT
Survey Shows Americans Fear Ghosts, the Government, and Each Other
Every year, Chapman University tells us what we fear the
Notable Articles about the Creation of CSICOP and SKEPTICAL INQUIRER
Susan Gerbic, founder of the Guerilla Skeptics on Wikipedia Project,
INVESTIGATIVE FILES
Claims of Chi: Besting a Tai Chi Master
Joe Nickell, PhD, is now well into his fifth decade
PSYCHIC VIBRATIONS
‘Mirage Men’—Disinformation Agents or Just a Mirage?
Sheaffer’s “Psychic Vibrations” column has appeared in the Skeptical Inquirer
NOTES ON A STRANGE WORLD
Ten Practical Tactics to Unravel the Uncanny
Massimo Polidoro is an investigator of the paranormal, lecturer, and
THE SCIENCE OF SCIENCE COMMUNICATION
The Superbug Crisis
False Beliefs about Antibiotics Are a Global Threat
BEHAVIOR & BELIEF
Consensus: Could Two Hundred Scientists Be Wrong?
Stuart Vyse is a psychologist and author of Believing in
SKEPTICAL INQUIREE
Ghost Hunters in the Dark
Benjamin Radford is a research fellow at the Committee for
ARTICLES
STEM CELL RESERACH: Still Embattled after All These Years
Had stem cell research not been obstructed by political and religious opposition, it would probably have arrived by now at effective treatments for a number of severe chronic diseases
Public Debate, Scientific Skepticism, and Science Denial
How can scientists navigate highly polarized public controversies, and how can the public’s legitimate demand for involvement be accommodated without compromising the integrity of science?
Creationism in Europe
Cretionism is not an exclusively North American phenomenon. In Europe, creationism is also finding a foothold, drawing the attention of European scholars
Project Greenglow: How Horizon Lost the Message in the Medium
When news media tailor their science reporting to their expected audiences, the message of science can get lost in the requirements of the medium. An episode of the BBC flagship science series Horizon offers an unfortunate example
No Time for Certainty
Uncertainty and imprecision are basic attributes of interpreting the world and should not be viewed with scorn or disdain but understood, measured (when possible), and mixed into the framework of well-planned and well-reasoned public policies
REVIEW
The Story of the Gene
Nearly six years ago, I reviewed Siddhartha Mukherjee’s book The
NEW AND NOTABLE
NEW AND NOTABLE
Listing does not preclude future review
QUIRKOLOGY COMICS
an introduction to JERRY ANDRUS
THE LAST LAUGH
THE LAST LAUGH