Pocketmags Digital Magazines
AU
Pocketmags Digital Magazines
   You are currently viewing the Australia version of the site.
Would you like to switch to your local site?
42 MIN READ TIME

‘Blue Whale’ Game Suicide Conspiracy Surfaces

Benjamin Radford

Early in 2017, scary warnings circulated on social media asking parents, teachers, and police to beware of a hidden threat to children: a sinister online “game” that can lead to death. A typical message dated May 16 warned:

The Blue Whale “suicide game” is believed to be a hidden online social media group which its main aim is to encourage our children to kill themselves. Within the group daily tasks are assigned to members [who] have to do different tasks for 50 days. They include self-harming, watching horror movies and waking up at unusual hours, but these gradually get more extreme. But on the 50th day, the controlling manipulators behind the game reportedly instruct the youngsters to commit suicide. Please share and warn all other parents of the dangers of this game. We do not want any deaths related to the game within the UK. (see https://tinyurl.com/ydfmld92)

Debunking website Snopes traced the story back to a May 2016 article on a Russian news site that “reported dozens of suicides of children in Russia during a six-month span, asserting that some of the people who had taken their lives were part of the same online game community.” While it appears to be true that some of the teens used the same social media gaming sites, it does not logically imply that there’s any link between the deaths or that the site caused them. It’s more likely that depressed teens may be drawn to certain websites than it is that those websites caused their users to become depressed and/or suicidal. And, of course, on any wildly popular social media site (including Instagram, Facebook, or Pogo) a small subset of users will share common characteristics, including mental illness, simply by random chance.

Read the complete article and many more in this issue of Skeptical Inquirer
Purchase options below
If you own the issue, Login to read the full article now.
Single Digital Issue January February 2018
 
$4.49
This issue and other back issues are not included in a new Skeptical Inquirer subscription. Subscriptions include the latest regular issue and new issues released during your subscription.
Annual Digital Subscription $25.99 billed annually
Save
4%
$25.99

This article is from...


View Issues
Skeptical Inquirer
January February 2018
VIEW IN STORE

Other Articles in this Issue


Editor’s Letter
Racial issues continue to plague us. After every new incident
NEWS AND COMMENT
The 2017 Chapman University Survey of American Fears came out
A DNA test confirmed that Maria Pilar Abel, a Spanish
Although scientists understand that the record of Earth’s surface and
Bruno Latour, the French sociologist who was a prime provocateur
COMMENTARY
The academic community doesn’t seem to take the spread of
INVESTIGATIVE FILES
Joe Nickell, PhD, author of numerous books, including Entities and
NOTES ON A STRANGE WORLD
Massimo Polidoro is an investigator of the paranormal, lecturer, and
THE SCIENCE OF SCIENCE COMMUNICATION
Why We Need a New Dialogue about Science, Inequality, and Society
BEHAVIOR & BELIEF
Stuart Vyse is a psychologist and author of Believing in
SCIENCE WATCH
Kenneth W. Krause is a contributing editor and “Science Watch”
SKEPTICAL INQUIREE
Benjamin Radford is a research fellow at the Committee for
INTERVIEW
“It’s the Equivalent of Murdering Somebody”
A SKEPTIC’S GUIDE TO RACISM
The racial divisiveness and tensions that erupted this past year
Racism is abhorrent. It is therefore easy for a movement
When my oldest child was in high school, the school
One of the defining characteristics of a pseudoscience is nonfalsifiability
Jennifer Eberhardt’s research shows subconscious connections in people’s minds between black faces and crime and how those links may pervert justice. Law enforcement officers across the country are taking note
FEATURES
Despite our strong scientific understanding of organic evolution, many introduce unfounded beliefs to create a hybrid view of evolution that is unscientific and should not be taught in science classrooms
Stuart Vyse’s (2017) article about Daryl Bem and p-hacking was
Are eating disorders on the rise? One widely cited statistic claims so but falters under scrutiny. Here is a case study of flawed information presented by a prominent eating disorder information organization
Two things that serve to maintain morale, focus, and motivation
Claims about “free energy” are all over the Internet. What’s it all about? Not real science
REVIEWS
Freud, the Making of an Illusion, by American literary critic
Pseudoscience and Science Fiction. By Andrew May. Springer, New York,
Hemingway Didn’t Say That: The Truth Behind Familiar Quotations. By
NEW AND NOTABLE
ALIENS: Past, Present, Future. Ron Miller. Author and illustrator Ron
FOLLOW UP
The following letter is from a longtime member of the
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
Although I was one of the good guys in getting
Thanks for Maarten Boudry’s “Fallacy Fork” (September/October 2017). He’s right:
Glad to see James Randi’s unequivocal denunciation of the (so-called)
Reading Matthew Nisbet’s column “Evolution in the College classroom” (September/October
In Terence Hines’s review of Tony Wolf’s book about Rose
In the letters column of the September/October SI, reader Norman
The November/December 2017 issue of SI went to print omitting
The letters column is a forum on mat ters raised
THE LAST LAUGH