We often think of the need for critical thinking in the context of nonscientific approaches to extraordinary claims about the natural world. We call that pseudoscience, and as an antidote we often prescribe more science courses, especially those focusing on skeptical thinking. But critical thinking is not unique to the sciences.
READ MORE
Purchase options below
Find the complete article and many more in this issue of
Skeptical Inquirer
-
July August 2017
If you own the issue,
Login to read the full article now.
Single Digital Issue
July August 2017
|
|
|
$4.49
|
|
|
This issue and other back issues are not included in a new Skeptical Inquirer subscription. Subscriptions include the latest regular issue and new issues released during your subscription.
Annual Digital Subscription
Only $
2.83 per issue
|
SAVE
37%
|
|
|
|
|
About Skeptical Inquirer
Fire-Breathing
Dinosaurs?
Physics, Fossils, and Functional
Morphology vs. Pseudoscience
JonBenet Murder Mystery Solved?
(Not by Psychics)
An Investigation of the
Missing411 Conspiracy