Shopping Cart -

Your cart is currently empty.
Continue Shopping
This website use cookies and similar technologies to improve the site and to provide customised content and advertising. By using this site, you agree to this use. To learn more, including how to change your cookie settings, please view our Cookie Policy
Pocketmags Digital Magazines
Pocketmags Digital Magazines
   You are currently viewing the Australia version of the site.
Would you like to switch to your local site?
Digital Subscriptions > The Hedge Fund Journal > Issue 134 – Aug 2018 > MGG: Can Alternative Credit be a Safe Haven?

MGG: Can Alternative Credit be a Safe Haven?


Championing creditor interests


Since MGG Investment Group (MGG) was founded in 2014, credit investors have been concerned about rising leverage and declining creditor protections in the corporate credit markets. Both metrics have reached extreme levels in 2018, argues MGG President and Co-Founder, Greg Racz.

“Leverage has now surpassed 2007 peaks on some measures, with roughly 20% of mid-market US LBOs now levered above seven times EBITDA. This is a gargantuan number that will be very hard for a business to cope with when inevitably this current expansion ends,” says Racz.

In a recession, the seven times could suddenly be eight or nine times or even more – and it may already be, when more conservative or simply conventional headline measures of EBITDA are used. Some 35% of US middle market deals have EBIDTA adjustments, according to Covenant Review. They are not based on last year’s real and actual EBITDA, but rather on both backward-looking and forward-looking adjustments. EBITDA figures may add back exceptional losses or non-recurring costs or both for “Normalised” EBITDA. Forecast EBITDA measures such as Run-rate EBITDA, or Pro-forma EBITDA, might reflect anticipated future revenues, cost savings, or potential merger synergies that may or may not be realised. In many deals, there is no cap on the quantum of adjustments, which can sometimes more than double the EBITDA figure. Professional investor groups such as CFA Institute have flagged how the growing use of non-GAAP financial measures, which nearly always increase reported profitability, make it more difficult to compare and reconcile financial statements. Ratings agency Moody’s classifies many of the adjustments as “aggressive”, based partly on historical analysis suggesting that cost savings are not always achieved.

Purchase options below
Find the complete article and many more in this issue of The Hedge Fund Journal - Issue 134 – Aug 2018
If you own the issue, Login to read the full article now.
Single Issue - Issue 134 – Aug 2018
Or 17999 points
6 Month Digital Subscription
Only $ 150.00 per issue
Or 74999 points

View Issues

About The Hedge Fund Journal

Informing the Hedge Fund Community. With access to some of the industry’s biggest names and an astute and talented group of writers and contributors, The Hedge Fund Journal has established itself as a trusted source of information on the hedge fund industry.