We use cookies to track usage and preferences. See Cookie Policy
Pocketmags Digital Magazines
CA
Pocketmags Digital Magazines
   You are currently viewing the Canada version of the site.
Would you like to switch to your local site?
Digital Subscriptions > Skeptic > 21.3 > Nightmares from the Id

Nightmares from the Id

The Neurophysiology of Anomalous Psychological Experiences

THE NOTION AND THE NAME (LATIN “ID”= ENGLISH “It” = German “Es”) are most closely associated with the name of Sigmund Freud. Freud, however, quite explicitly and with due acknowledgement, took the term from Georg Groddeck’s Das Buch vom Es. Even before Groddeck, Nietzsche had used the term to refer to the most basic level of human nature along the lines of Schopenhauer’s notion of the will. By the time Freud appropriated and popularized the term, he had abandoned his quest for a scientific (i.e., neurologically-based) psychology, and hence did not speculate deeply about neurology of the id. Recently, however, we have acquired a fairly detailed understanding of the neural location of something very like the Nietzschean id, one without the quirky psychoanalytic baggage.

What I am suggesting as a neurological id has its center deep within the temporal lobes of the brain. Its nucleus is a small structure called the amygdala and includes a number of associated brain structures (such as the basal nucleus of Meynert, the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, and the anterior cingulate cortex). We might think of these structures, collectively, as constituting the core of an “id brain.” We are also gaining an understanding of the nature and function of this neurological id. Interestingly, this modern version of the id turns out to be, metaphorically speaking, at least as terrified as it is terrifying and more threatened than threatening. This is likely a reflection of the fact that our early ancestors were as likely to have been prey as predators—and, as predators, their own favorite prey.

Neuroimaging studies have shown that the amygdala is particularly responsive to fearful faces, even those presented extremely briefly and without strong evidence of people being conscious of having seen the faces. Thus, signs of danger are processed by the unconscious id well before they enter consciousness. This is possible because the amygdala receives sensory inputs independent of, and more directly than, “higher” cortical centers. Moreover, the amygdala is a well-connected structure that sends out information to a staggering number of centers throughout the brain and, in return, receives information from many cortical sensory systems (vision, hearing, bodily sensations, etc.). Thus, it is not surprising that the amygdala is implicated in many emotional disorders, including depression, phobias, and posttraumatic stress disorder. For example, brain-imaging studies have reported that the amygdalae of PTSD patients are more responsive to fearful faces than are control subjects.

The amygdala does not seem, however, to be the immediate source of fearful feelings. The structures responsible for the subjective feeling of fear are likely further downstream (i.e., involving later processing), consistent with the common experience of reacting to an emergency driving situation and feeling the fear only later. Growing evidence suggests that the most immediate and direct function of the amygdala is to prepare the higher cortical centers to attend to and analyze emergency situations through a kind of threatactivate vigilance system (TAVS). The TAVS is very sensitive to threat cues, responding even when such cues are presented so briefly that they do not register in consciousness. The id brain, however, does not have the analytic power for a fine-grained analysis of sensory input. Detailed perceptual analysis can be achieved only by recruiting the vastly more powerful, if somewhat more sluggish, cortex. This recruitment is achieved by infecting the rest of brain with the id’s own paranoid bias, directing us to consciously interpret what might otherwise be taken as innocuous events as threatening. In a sense, the entire brain becomes temporarily paranoid under the influence of the amygdala. Moreover, once the TAVS has been activated, the cortex becomes more likely to scrutinize subsequent threat cues or anything resembling them.

READ MORE
Purchase options below
Find the complete article and many more in this issue of Skeptic - 21.3
If you own the issue, Login to read the full article now.
Single Issue - 21.3
$6.99
Or 699 points
Annual Digital Subscription
Only $ 5.25 per issue
SAVE
25%
$20.99
Or 2099 points

View Issues

About Skeptic

INTERNET PORNOGRAPHY SPECIAL SECTION: IS PORNOGRAPHY BAD FOR YOU?; How Porn Is Messing with Your Manhood; Skeptical of Porn Skeptics; Hazards of Herbal Medicine: Lessons from Aristolochia; What is Sexual Orientation?; Did a Teenager Discover an Ancient Mayan City on Google Earth?; Paleo Diets and Utopian Dreams; Does AA Work? Alcoholics Anonymous, 12-Step Programs, and What We Really Know About Substance Abuse Treatment; The Clash of Eschatologies: The Role of End-Times Thinking in World History; Nightmares from the Id: The Neurophysiology of Anomalous Psychological Experiences; Terror Attacks that Never Were; Electromagnetic Fields and Parental Panics: A Case Study in How Science Can Bring Comfort; REVIEWS: Who Invented Science?; Science and the Creation of the Modern Mind; Heaven Is Not For Real; When Scientific American Put Psychics to the Test; JUNIOR SKEPTIC: MammothMysteries! Part One. The Hidden History of Mammoths and Mastodons
Ways to Pay Pocketmags Payment Types
At Pocketmags you get Secure Billing Great Offers HTML Reader Gifting options Loyalty Points