CA
  
You are currently viewing the Canada version of the site.
Would you like to switch to your local site?
123 MIN READ TIME

Why E-Cat Is a Hoax

SADRI HASSANI

Calling something energy catalysis (E-Cat), low-energy nuclear reactions (LENR), or condensed matter nuclear science (CMNS) cannot hide the fact that the idea is simply the same cold fusion announced to the press in March 1989. As cold fusion was notoriously debunked by the scientific community in the 1990s (Close 1991; Huizenga 1994; Taubes 1993; see also David W. Ball’s article in this issue), new names such as these popped up to conceal the true identity of the idea. The underlying physics on which all these processes are based is nuclear fusion. (To grasp the absurdity of the claims, it helps to have a nodding familiarity with the basics of nuclear interactions; I discuss those in the box on page 38.)

How E-Cat Is Alleged to Work

E-Cat is the brainchild of Andrea Rossi, a self-proclaimed inventor with a master’s degree in philosophy and a degree in chemical engineering from the University of Kensington in California, which was subsequently identified as a diploma mill and shut down (Holguin 2004). He has demonstrated his E-Cat generators to audiences around the world but has not revealed how all the black boxes composing his machine work (Krivit 2011). The only thing we know about the E-Cat generator is that it is a cell consisting of nickel and hydrogen. This was not directly revealed by Rossi but became known after he challenged his competitor’s patent (E-Cat World 2015; see https://patents.google.com/patent/EP2702593B1/en). The details of how the patent allegedly accomplishes cold fusion is given in blog posts—as is the entire literature on cold fusion and LENR (see https://e-catworld.com/, http://news.newenergytimes.net/, https://animpossibleinvention.com/, and http://www.quantumheat.org/index.php/en/).

Read the complete article and many more in this issue of Skeptical Inquirer
Purchase options below
If you own the issue, Login to read the full article now.
Single Digital Issue January/February 2019
 
$3.99 / issue
This issue and other back issues are not included in a new subscription. Subscriptions include the latest regular issue and new issues released during your subscription. Skeptical Inquirer
Annual Digital Subscription $23.99 billed annually
$4.00 / issue

This article is from...


View Issues
Skeptical Inquirer
January/February 2019
VIEW IN STORE

Other Articles in this Issue


Editor’s Letter
Cold Fusion to E-Cat: From Pathological Science to … Worse
It is hard to believe three decades have passed. This
THE MYTHS OF ENDLESS ENERGY
COLD FUSION Thirty Years Later
In March 1989, the claim of a revolutionary discovery in nuclear energy production galvanized the scientific community. It turned into a classic case of pathological science—and a textbook example of the self-correcting nature of science
FEATURES
The Sputtering Engine of Creator Belief
Far from belief in a supernatural creator being a natural consequence of the way our brains work like language, materialism, and sex, it is an easily cast-off opinion quickly losing ground in the United States and much of the world
It Is Not the God Engine That Sputters ...
A Response to Gregory Paul
Screening for Prostate and Breast Cancer: It’s More Complex Than You May Think
Cancer screening searches for cancer before its symptoms appear. Messages encouraging screening for prostate and breast cancer are not only filled with misleading statistics, they also do not discuss the most significant harm of screening: being diagnosed and treated needlessly
PROFILE
Better Than Dumbledore
Have you ever wondered what it would be like if
RESEARCH REVIEW
Could Multiple Personality Disorder Explain Life, the Universe, and Everything?
Authors Bernardo Kastrup, Adam Crabtree, and Edward Kelly posed the
COLUMNS
Fringe Scientist Santilli’s Suit Against Dutch Astronomer Settled
An American fringe scientist sued an innocent astronomer on the
The New IPCC Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) special report released
Social Media–Fueled Child Abduction Rumors Lead to Killings
Misinformation is always problematic but can be especially malicious in
UK eHarmony Ads Banned for False Claims of Science
In January 2018, Britain’s Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) banned advertisements
Kraken: Monster of the Deep
Joe Nickell, PhD, is CSI’s senior research fellow. This year,
How to Be Skeptics 2.0 with the Help of … YouTube
Massimo Polidoro is an investigator of the paranormal, lecturer, and
Is Acupuncture Winning?
Harriet Hall, MD, also known as “The SkepDoc,” is a
Talking Science and Society at Church
Let’s Put Aside Differences to Tackle Society’s Biggest Challenges
‘Class A’ Bigfoot Report Reveals Little about the Beast—and Much about the Seekers
Benjamin Radford is a research fellow at the Committee for
[NEW AND NOTABLE
Listing does not preclude future review
The God Engine
I thoroughly enjoyed your article “The God Engine” in the
Rethinking Radiation and Nuclear Power
The article by Jeanne Goldberg is an essential contribution, not
Advocating Science to Religious Believers
The commentary by Davidson, Hill, and Wolgemuth recommends that the
Challenging Homeopathy
In the September/October issue, Kendrick Frazier describes comparison tests of
Creating an Apparition
The September/October issue of Skeptical Inquirer contains a three-page special
Readers’ Myopia on Pinker
Regarding the reader comments (Letters to Editor, September/October 2018) on
THE LAST LAUGH
REVIEWS
A Skeptical Guide through the Conspiracy Rabbit Hole
After devoting the past fifteen years to online conspiracy-fighting projects
What Are Contact ‘Experiencers’ Really Experiencing?
Beyond UFOs: The Science of Consciousness and Contact with Non-Human
Say It Isn’t So
Rigor Mortis: How Sloppy Science Creates Worthless Cures, Crushes Hope,
We Need to Put the Reproducibility Problem in Perspective
“Let us hope it is not true, but if it