Shopping Cart -

Your cart is currently empty.
Continue Shopping
This website use cookies and similar technologies to improve the site and to provide customised content and advertising. By using this site, you agree to this use. To learn more, including how to change your cookie settings, please view our Cookie Policy
Pocketmags Digital Magazines
DE
Pocketmags Digital Magazines
   You are currently viewing the Germany version of the site.
Would you like to switch to your local site?
Digital Subscriptions > Prospect Magazine > April 2019 > The Stanford prison experiment shaped our understanding of evil. It led us badly astray

The Stanford prison experiment shaped our understanding of evil. It led us badly astray

Inhumanity is as old as humanity itself, yet—curiously—we can trace our modern understanding of it to a single year: 1961. Until then, to the extent that they were ready to grapple with the horrors of the gulag and the gas chamber at all, thinkers sought an answer to the “how could they do that?” question with the idea of a distinct individual pathology. The old presumption was that those who do monstrous things must themselves be monsters. But, in the middle of 1961, two events—many thousands of miles away from each other—coincided to change our understanding entirely. They started to paint the grim picture of the brute within us all—a picture which appeared to be confirmed by the notorious Stanford prison experiment 10 years later. But it is a picture which new evidence is fast unravelling.

Back in 1961 however, the first of those two defining events was the trial of Adolf Eichmann in Jerusalem. One of those sitting in the courtroom was the political philosopher Hannah Arendt. Like those around her, she expected the man responsible for millions of deaths to be a terrifying figure. What she saw instead was a balding, rather hunched and altogether insignificant individual. In Eichmann in Jerusalem, Arendt concluded that it was that very insignificance which ultimately made him more terrifying than she had imagined, for it suggested that anyone could become a genocidal perpetrator. The monster was not “out there” in others, it was inside all of us. And she summed up this idea in a phrase that haunts us still: “the fearsome, wordand- thought-defying banality of evil.”

READ MORE
Purchase options below
Find the complete article and many more in this issue of Prospect Magazine - April 2019
If you own the issue, Login to read the full article now.
Single Issue - April 2019
€5,49
Or 549 points
Annual Digital Subscription
Only € 4,50 per issue
SAVE
18%
€44,99
Or 4499 points

View Issues

About Prospect Magazine

In Prospect’s April issue: Mark Damazer, the former controller of BBC Radio 4, tells the inside story of how the BBC has tried—and sometimes failed—to cover the political crisis that overshadows everything else. Elsewhere in the issue: Playwright and screenwriter James Graham profiles John Bercow, the Speaker of the House of Commons, as he takes centre-stage in the unfolding Brexit drama and Tom Clark examines the Independent Group and argues that they could well shake up the established political tribes. Also, Jennifer Williams highlights the growing gap between the haves and have-nots in Manchester—a city that is simultaneously experiencing a housing boom and a homelessness crisis.