The Front page of ATG No 2312 and, abov, Michael Baggott’s letter in ATG No 2339.
MADAM – Michael Baggott’s recent letter about the potential adverse impact of the ivory sales ban on the display of ivory pieces by museums (ATG No 2339) is, with respect, misguided.
He is right that the ‘Sandringham case’ based on the current rules meant that an ivory piece was removed from display in 2017 because Sandringham House charged an entrance fee. That was a perverse consequence of the current law and it should be changed.