EU
  
You are currently viewing the European Union version of the site.
Would you like to switch to your local site?
96 MIN READ TIME

The Three Shades of Atheism

When we think of prominent atheists, we may conjure up an image of one of the “Four Horsemen” of the New Atheism—Christopher Hitchens, Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins, and Daniel Dennett—authors famous for their steadfast rejection of any form of deity and their willingness to confront the world’s religions. Ironically, however, when we see them in debates and interviews, the confidence with which they make their case and discount the opposition may at times seem indistinguishable from the offputting dogmatism of the hyper-religious. How typical of atheists are the Four Horsemen?

Our research, based on a sample of hundreds of respondents to a survey distributed through social media, indicates that they probably represent a common form of atheism but not the majority view. Most atheists express some degree of tentativeness in their beliefs and would be prepared to consider contrary evidence and arguments. In other words, they are skeptical in their orientation rather than dogmatic. However, the prevalence of dogmatic atheism may come as a surprise to some observers, including Richard Dawkins,1 who stated that he “would be surprised to meet many people” who would say “I know there is no God.” Many respondents in our survey said this.

Unlock this article and much more with
You can enjoy:
Enjoy this edition in full
Instant access to 600+ titles
Thousands of back issues
No contract or commitment
Try for €1.09
SUBSCRIBE NOW
30 day trial, then just €11,99 / month. Cancel anytime. New subscribers only.


Learn more
Pocketmags Plus
Pocketmags Plus

This article is from...


View Issues
Skeptic
22.2
VIEW IN STORE

Other Articles in this Issue


COLUMNS
The SkepDoc
pH Mythology: Separating pHacts from pHiction
The Gadfly
Are You An Unconscious Racist?
ARTICLES
The Rise of the Alt-Right and the Politics of Polarization in America
The Rise of the Alt-Right and the Politics of Polarization
Delusions of the Imagination
How the “Tractor”—an Early 19th Century Medical Quack Device—Was Debunked by One of the Earliest Single Blind Placebo Studies
Area 51: What is Really Going on There?
UFOs and U-2s, Aliens and A-12s
Is Race a Useful Concept?
WE SEEK TO ADDRESS A SINGULAR, SIMPLE QUESTION: are
SPECIAL SECTION AI DANGER
Why We Should Be Concerned About Artificial Superintelligence
The human brain isn’t magic; nor are the problem-solving
Why Artificial Intelligence is Not an Existential Threat
OVER THE YEARS EXISTENTIAL THREAT WARNINGS have been
Artificial Intelligence Simulation, Not Synthesis
After over 50 years of mostly empty promises and disappointments
REVIEWS
Think Again
Rethink: The Surprising History of New Ideas by Steven Poole
The Ultimate Trade Off
A review of How Men Age: What Evolution Reveals About Male Health and Mortality by Richard G. Bribiescas
Playing Whac-a-Mole with Science Deniers
A Review of Not a Scientist: How Politicians Mistake, Misrepresent, and Utterly Mangle Science by Dave Levitan.
Frauds and Cons
Reviews of: Big Con: Great Hoaxes, Frauds, Grifts, and Swindles in American History by Nate Hendley Fraud: An American History from Barnum to Madoff by Edward J. Balliesen Houdini’s ‘Girl Detective’ compiled by Tony Wolf The Confidence Game: Why We Fall For it…Every Time by Maria Konnikova
Any Sufficiently Advanced Human is Indistinguishable from God
Review of Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow by Yuval Noah Harari.
JUNIOR SKEPTIC
TERRIFYING! IMPROBABLE! CHEMTRAILS!
We’ve all heard the story of Chicken Little—a fanciful