Shopping Cart -

Your cart is currently empty.
This website use cookies and similar technologies to improve the site and to provide customised content and advertising. By using this site, you agree to this use. To learn more, including how to change your cookie settings, please view our Cookie Policy
Pocketmags Digital Magazines
Pocketmags Digital Magazines
   You are currently viewing the European Union version of the site.
Would you like to switch to your local site?
Read anywhere Read anywhere
Ways to pay Pocketmags Payment Types
Trusted site
At Pocketmags you get
Secure Billing
Great Offers
Web & App Reader
Gifting Options
Loyalty Points


Marching onto new lands with only a few missteps


Marching onto new lands with only a few missteps

One of the great strengths of Conquest is its aesthetic. With a visual style equal parts Renaissance artwork and Dark Souls, filled with ornamental armour and masked monstrosities, it’s clear that its creators – including former Warhammer 40,000 and Lords of the Rings Strategy Battle Game designer Alessio Cavatore, who handled Conquest’s ruleset – have spared no expense in creating a setting suitably grimdark for their new wargame.

The miniatures action itself is of the rank-and-file variety, using regiments comprised of square-based figures with detailed rules for movement, reforming and attacks on the front, side or rear flanks.

Combat is a quick, bloody affair; unlike other wargames where players roll to hit, then wound, attacking units simply roll once to determine whether a blow has been landed. Comparative modifiers (the attacker’s strength versus the defender’s toughness value or suchlike) have been completely eschewed in favour of a simpler method of having a base armour save value.

Special rules are layered over this system of rolling to hit, rolling to save; depending on the type of blow inflicted, the defending unit may suffer a negative penalty to their armour value or have to re-roll successful saves. It’s a simple system that saves time by not forcing players to continuously resort to comparison charts.

Combat is further sped up by the morale system, which requires players to roll for additional casualties after a regiment loses units. It certainly makes for a quick game overall, but can feel a bit punitive at times.

The real gameplay standouts are Conquest’s two signature features. The first is the way deployment works. Instead of setting up armies at the beginning of the game, players roll each turn to see what class of unit (split between light, medium and heavy) will arrive. Light regiments show up earlier in the battle, with medium and heavy units entering the fray later on. It’s a clever system that prevents games from becoming stodgy ‘line-up-and-fight’ affairs, made more nuanced by the addition of a battle line, which allows a player to bring in units from the sides of the table as their forces gain ground.

The other major feature is Conquest’s card-based activation system. Players have a stack of command cards, with each corresponding to a given unit. A turn alternates between players as they activate each unit, which they do by playing its card. The twist is that players have to arrange their command stack at the beginning of a turn, locking them into a sequence of play regardless of their opponent’s moves. Much of Conquest’s appeal comes from working out what order to activate your regiments in, an element of forethought and planning that adds to the tactical depth.

Beyond the mechanics, however, the core box itself is somewhat anemic; each side feels more like a taster force than a fully-Thedged army. Though most wargames do this to compel players to invest in the game, it feels particularly noticeable here. The dearth of regiments may also be down to the purely physical consideration of how many sprues can be fitted into the box. The figures are 38mm in scale – a size that few if any other game s use – and compared to regular 28mm miniatures even a baseline Conquest human is virtually ogre-sized. It’s a very disappointing move as it severely curtails much of the interchangeability that is the lifeblood of wargaming; most gamers’ scenery will be the wrong scale and there’s little chance of using the miniatures as proxies for anything else, despite the fact that the core box’s human faction are essentially just medieval soldiers.

Overall, Conquest hits more marks than it misses, and is worth a look if you’re interested in seeing a new take on fantasy mass-battle systems.



A game with a unique aesthetic, Conquest introduces some interesting mechanics to the rank-and-file wargame system, but is let down slightly by the miniatures themselves.


► 69 miniatures

► 12 dice

► Eight command cards

► 20 secondary objective cards

► Six thematic objective markers


Though less visually unique than Conquest, Runewars offers fans of regimented fantasy wargames another system with which to sate their bloodlust.

Purchase options below
Find the complete article and many more in this issue of The Best Games of 2019 - The Best Games of 2019
If you own the issue, Login to read the full article now.
Single Issue - The Best Games of 2019
Or 1099 points

View Issues

About The Best Games of 2019

Must Plays and more in our Best Games of 2019 issue of Tabletop Gaming. Over the next 196 pages discover all of the most positively reviewed games of the year. With a massive 181 games reviewed, this is the definitive “what to play next” guide of 2019! Games reviewed include: Wingspan Copenhagen Hellboy: The Board Game Res Arcana Lifeform Century: A New World Megacity: Oceania Pandemic: Fall of Rome Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay: Rough Nights & Hard Days Azul: Stained Glass of Sinatra Tapestry Letter Jam Hako Onna Everdell Battle Ravens Dune + Many more!

Other Articles in this Issue