Shopping Cart -

Your cart is currently empty.
Upgrade to today
for only an extra Cxx.xx

You get:

plus This issue of xxxxxxxxxxx.
plus Instant access to the latest issue of 460+ of our top selling titles.
plus Unlimited access to 39000+ back issues
plus No contract or commitment. If you decide that PocketmagsPlus is not for you, you can cancel your monthly subscription online at any time. Auto-renews at €11,99 per month, unless cancelled.
Upgrade for €1.09
Then just €11,99 / month. Cancel anytime.
Learn more
Pocketmags Digital Magazines
Pocketmags Digital Magazines
   You are currently viewing the Italy version of the site.
Would you like to switch to your local site?
Leggi ovunque Read anywhere
Modalità di pagamento Pocketmags Payment Types
Trusted site
A Pocketmags si ottiene
Fatturazione sicura
Ultime offerte
Web & App Reader
Loyalty Points

Oceans of Data: New Ways to Measure Global Warming

David Morrison

Although scientists understand that the record of Earth’s surface and atmospheric temperatures over the past century show a signature of warming correlated with rising carbon dioxide levels, there remain many doubters and deniers. One problem is that the land and atmosphere temperature data contain many sources of “noise” such as solar variability, El Niño cycles, and weather. This noise must be identified and corrected to clearly reveal the warming signal. A new, alternative approach to analyzing the data has recently been described by a team of international climate scientists led by Lijing Cheng. Their paper appears in the September 2017 issue of EOS, published by the American Geophysical Union. This alternative is based on measurements of the ocean.

Most of the additional heat associated with global warming is deposited in the ocean. The very large mass and heat capacity of the ocean also minimizes external “noise.” These scientists suggest two ways to measure the heating of the ocean. The first uses data available since 2006 on ocean temperatures, using the Argo autonomous floats that measure temperature of the top 2 km of water. The second measures long-term changes in sea level from satellite altimetry, which has been possible since the early 1990s. Both of these data sets show clear signatures of heat deposition in the ocean, from the temperature changes in the top 2 km of water and from the expansion of the ocean water due to heating. These two measures are less noisy than land and atmospheric temperatures.

What time interval is necessary to show a statistically sound signature of global warming? They find that the warming signal is clear from just three to four years of data on either ocean temperatures or sea level, while the same significance requires more than two decades of surface and atmosphere temperatures. In addition, there is the advantage that it is ocean changes that currently dominate discussion of the hazards of global warming. Sea level rise is directly connected to coastal flooding from storm surges, and water temperatures are also implicated in the strength of tropical storms. Warmer water evaporates more quickly and deposits more energy into tropical storms forming over water. At a time when storm damage and flooding are in the headlines, using direct measurements of the ocean itself may inform and influence the broader political discussions of the hazards of climate change.

Read the complete article and many more in this issue of Skeptical Inquirer
Purchase options below
If you own the issue, Login to read the full article now.
Single Digital Issue January February 2018
This issue and other back issues are not included in a new Skeptical Inquirer subscription. Subscriptions include the latest regular issue and new issues released during your subscription.
Annual Digital Subscription €16,99 billed annually

This article is from...

View Issues
Skeptical Inquirer
January February 2018

Other Articles in this Issue

Editor’s Letter
Racial issues continue to plague us. After every new incident
The 2017 Chapman University Survey of American Fears came out
A DNA test confirmed that Maria Pilar Abel, a Spanish
Bruno Latour, the French sociologist who was a prime provocateur
Early in 2017, scary warnings circulated on social media asking
The academic community doesn’t seem to take the spread of
Joe Nickell, PhD, author of numerous books, including Entities and
Massimo Polidoro is an investigator of the paranormal, lecturer, and
Why We Need a New Dialogue about Science, Inequality, and Society
Stuart Vyse is a psychologist and author of Believing in
Kenneth W. Krause is a contributing editor and “Science Watch”
Benjamin Radford is a research fellow at the Committee for
“It’s the Equivalent of Murdering Somebody”
The racial divisiveness and tensions that erupted this past year
Racism is abhorrent. It is therefore easy for a movement
When my oldest child was in high school, the school
One of the defining characteristics of a pseudoscience is nonfalsifiability
Jennifer Eberhardt’s research shows subconscious connections in people’s minds between black faces and crime and how those links may pervert justice. Law enforcement officers across the country are taking note
Despite our strong scientific understanding of organic evolution, many introduce unfounded beliefs to create a hybrid view of evolution that is unscientific and should not be taught in science classrooms
Stuart Vyse’s (2017) article about Daryl Bem and p-hacking was
Are eating disorders on the rise? One widely cited statistic claims so but falters under scrutiny. Here is a case study of flawed information presented by a prominent eating disorder information organization
Two things that serve to maintain morale, focus, and motivation
Claims about “free energy” are all over the Internet. What’s it all about? Not real science
Freud, the Making of an Illusion, by American literary critic
Pseudoscience and Science Fiction. By Andrew May. Springer, New York,
Hemingway Didn’t Say That: The Truth Behind Familiar Quotations. By
ALIENS: Past, Present, Future. Ron Miller. Author and illustrator Ron
The following letter is from a longtime member of the
Although I was one of the good guys in getting
Thanks for Maarten Boudry’s “Fallacy Fork” (September/October 2017). He’s right:
Glad to see James Randi’s unequivocal denunciation of the (so-called)
Reading Matthew Nisbet’s column “Evolution in the College classroom” (September/October
In Terence Hines’s review of Tony Wolf’s book about Rose
In the letters column of the September/October SI, reader Norman
The November/December 2017 issue of SI went to print omitting
The letters column is a forum on mat ters raised