IT
  
Attualmente si sta visualizzando la versione Italy del sito.
Volete passare al vostro sito locale?
41 TEMPO DI LETTURA MIN

Massless Is Not Nonmaterial

SADRI HASSANI

Pseudoscientists and Eastern mystagogues have been propagating the myth that only objects that have mass are material. Their efforts have been so successful that even some physicists adhere to that myth. Here is an astrophysicist describing the myth to a gleeful Dalai Lama: “You can see [energy transforming into mass] happening in elementary particle processes. A photon is transformed into two material particles: an electron and an antielectron. Material is produced from pure energy, from a photon” (Zajonc 2004, 205). The statement is actually wrong in more than one way (Hassani 2016, 46).

Using four different approaches, this commentary shows that the myth of nonmateriality of massless particles is just that—a myth.

Let’s start with what is not material. Everyone, including the most opportunistically dishonest pseudoscientist, agrees that spirit, soul, God, universal consciousness, as well as “energy,” “field,” and “energy field” transmitted via the practice of qi, reiki, touch therapy, prayer, and other alternative medical protocols are nonmaterial. What is common among them is that they cannot be seen, heard, touched, or subjected to any quantifiable measurement. Let’s summarize this by saying that nonmaterial objects are not detectable. The undetectability of nonmaterial entities suggests that detectability determines the materiality of an object. Depending on the physical properties of the material objects, we can identify at least three kinds of detectors: sensuous, interactive, and microscopic.

Leggete l'articolo completo e molti altri in questo numero di Skeptical Inquirer
Opzioni di acquisto di seguito
Se il problema è vostro, Accesso per leggere subito l'articolo completo.
Singolo numero digitale July August 2019
 
€3,49 / issue
Questo numero e altri numeri arretrati non sono inclusi in un nuovo abbonamento. Gli abbonamenti comprendono l'ultimo numero regolare e i nuovi numeri pubblicati durante l'abbonamento. Skeptical Inquirer
Abbonamento digitale annuale €19,99 fatturati annualmente
Risparmiare
5%
€3,33 / issue

Questo articolo è...


View Issues
Skeptical Inquirer
July August 2019
VISUALIZZA IN NEGOZIO

Altri articoli in questo numero


Editor’s Letter
Effective Science Activism and Three Thanks
We have published several recent articles arguing that to be
FEATURES
TEAM SCIENCE Building Better Science Activists
with Insights from Disney, Marketing, and Psychological Research
Conspiring for the Common Good
Why have conspiracy theories become more prevalent in our political discourse than at any other time in recent history? According to opinion polls, conspiracy theories on the whole are very popular in the United States, and social scientists are trying to understand why
A Stegosaur Carving on the Ruins of Ta Prohm? Think Again
An ancient Khmer carving has been interpreted as a stegosaur, leading some to conclude that dinosaurs and humans lived together. An investigation of the claim and other carvings suggest otherwise
Teaching College Students Critical Thinking Skills by Posing as a ‘Registered Psychic’
When college students who signed up for a class called Critical Thinking about the Paranormal were introduced to a guest speaker who claimed “psychic ability, they were taken in by his cold reading abilities
Confessions of an American Opium-Prescriber
Thousands of Americans have died from opioid overdoses after receiving medical treatment for pain or addiction. However, new clinical dilemmas often confront prescribers who try to protect patients through reducing doses or substituting safer medicines
The Curse
In the first in this series, we found that creationists believe God red-shifted the light from the stars to make a young universe look like an old one. In this episode, we will discover that creationists believe God corrupted his own perfect and beautiful world
COLUMNS
skepticalinquirer.org
See Skeptical Inquirer’s New, Entirely Redesigned Website
Space Exploration: Robots vs. Humans
What should be the roles of humans and robots in
Lorraine Warren Dead at Ninety-Two
Lorraine Warren—who with her late husband “investigated” alleged demon-possessed houses—died
[ FROM THE EDITOR
Other terms that have been updated, including the use of
Premonition! Foreseeing What Cannot Be Seen
Joe Nickell, PhD, is CSI’s senior research fellow and author of some forty books
Science Envy in Alternative Medicine
Harriet Hall, MD, also known as “The SkepDoc,” is a
Who Are More Biased: Liberals or Conservatives?
Stuart Vyse is a psychologist and author of Believing in
DNA Is Not Destiny: Challenging the Hype over Genetic Testing
Matthew C. Nisbet is professor of communication at Northeastern University
Anomaly Hunting with Satellite Images
Benjamin Radford is a research fellow at the Committee for
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
Craig Foster (“Respectful Skepticism,” March/April 2019) makes the serious linguistic
REVIEWS
When Athletes Fall for Bogus Gimmicks
The more desperate people are to achieve some goal, the
[NEW AND NOTABLE
Listing does not preclude future review
A Friendly Guide Showing How Ghost Hunters Go Wrong
Investigating Ghosts: The Scientific Search for Spirits. By Benjamin Radford
SPECIAL REPORTS
Why Parapsychological Claims Cannot Be True
The claims of parapsychology violate causality, time’s arrow, thermodynamics, and the inverse square law. They cannot be true
The Not So Divine Acts of Medium ‘John of God’
John of God (João de Deus, real name João Teixeira