Shopping Cart -

Your cart is currently empty.
Upgrade to today
for only an extra Cxx.xx

You get:

plus This issue of xxxxxxxxxxx.
plus Instant access to the latest issue of 420+ of our top selling titles.
plus Unlimited access to 34000+ back issues
plus No contract or commitment. If you decide that PocketmagsPlus is not for you, you can cancel your monthly subscription online at any time. Auto-renews at €11,99 per month, unless cancelled.
Upgrade for €1.09
Then just €11,99 / month. Cancel anytime.
Learn more
Pocketmags Digital Magazines
IT
Pocketmags Digital Magazines
   You are currently viewing the Italy version of the site.
Would you like to switch to your local site?
Leggi ovunque Read anywhere
Modalità di pagamento Pocketmags Payment Types
Trusted site
A Pocketmags si ottiene
Fatturazione sicura
Ultime offerte
Web & App Reader
Regali
Loyalty Points
77 MIN READ TIME

The Mote in Thy Brother’s Eye

THOMAS GILOVICH and LEE ROSS

One of the most consequential Supreme Court actions in recent U.S. history was its 2000 decision in Bush v. Gore. (Imagine how differently the United States might have reacted to the September 11, 2001, attacks on the World Trade Center if Gore had been president rather than Bush—no invasion of Iraq; almost certainly a speedier and more determined effort to wean the United States from dependence on oil from the Middle East; and a greater priority given to the development of renewable energy sources to curb climate change.)

The decision blocked a recount of ballots in the exceptionally close race in Florida, handing the presidency to George W. Bush. Critics were quick to note that the 5–4 decision split perfectly along the Court’s conservative-liberal lines. Many were outraged that the majority justices were suddenly willing to insert federal authority in this case despite their frequently expressed reservations about judicial activism and their advocacy of states’ rights and a narrow interpretation of the equal protection clause. As one legal scholar observed, “I do not know a single person who believes that if the parties were reversed, if Gore were challenging a recount ordered by a Republican Florida Supreme Court…[the majority] would have reached for a startling and innovative principle of constitutional law to hand Gore the victory” (Stone 2001).

While most Democrats thought the majority’s decision was tainted by ideological and motivational bias, the five justices behind that opinion insisted otherwise. They maintained that they were applying the law in an even-handed fashion. Justice Clarence Thomas told a group of students in Washington, D.C., that the decision was not in any way influenced by parti sanship (Balkin 2001). Justice Antonin Scalia has been even more dismissive of any such claim, telling an audience at Wesleyan University to “get over it” (“Scalia: Get over it” 2012). Conservative pundits, it should be noted, agreed with Scalia and Thomas and, we suspect, would contend that it was the four dissenting liberal justices whose opinions in the case had been influenced by their political leanings.

READ MORE
Purchase options below
Find the complete article and many more in this issue of Skeptical Inquirer - March April 2016
If you own the issue, Login to read the full article now.
View Issues

About Skeptical Inquirer

Biological Race and the Problem of Human Diversity Skepticism and the Nature of the Mind The Mote in Thy Brother’s Eye Searching for the Yowie, the Down Under Bigfoot ...and much more.

Single Digital Issue March April 2016
 
FREE
Read Now
Getting free sample issues is easy, but we need to add it to an account to read, so please follow the instructions to read your free issue today.
This issue and other back issues are not included in a new Skeptical Inquirer subscription. Subscriptions include the latest regular issue and new issues released during your subscription.
Annual Digital Subscription €16,99 billed annually
Save
5%
€16,99

Other Articles in this Issue


Editor’s Letter
Every issue of the SKEPTICAL INQUIRER presents an eclectic mix
NEWS AND COMMENT
Reports surfaced in England shortly before Halloween 2015 of people
Members of the Section of Medical Sciences of the Hungarian
On Halloween weekend 2015, scary news reports and warnings on
The Center for Inquiry Libraries (www.cfili-braries.org) has received a small
The 2015 Carl Sagan Prize for Science Popularization has gone
A strange photo of what appears to be an unknown
Edzard Ernst has received the 2015 John Maddox Prize for
SPECIAL REPORT
The largely unregulated world of dietary supplements is like the
FORUM
The Roman Catholic teaching, doctrine, and dogma of Divine Providence
INVESTIGATIVE FILES
Joe Nickell, PhD, is a skeptical cryptozoologist and author of
NOTES ON A STRANGE WORLD
Massimo Polidoro is an investigator of the paranormal, lecturer, and
PSYCHIC VIBRATIONS
Sheaffer’s “Psychic Vibrations” column has appeared in the SKEPTICAL INQUIRER
THE SCIENCE OF SCIENCE COMMUNICATION
Matthew Nisbet is associate professor of communication at Northeastern University
BEHAVIOR & BELIEF
Stuart Vyse is a psychologist and author of Believing in
SKEPTICAL INQUIREE
Benjamin Radford is a research fellow at the Committee for
FEATURES
Some would see any notion of “race” recede unceremoniously into
Writers and readers of the Skeptical Inquirer and of the
Excerpted by the author from A Numerate Life: A Mathematician
Hugh Ross is the founder and charismatic leader of a
REVIEWS
This Book Won’t Cure Your Cancer. By Gideon Burrows. NGO
Troublemaker: Surviving Hollywood and Scientology. By Leah Remini. Ballantine Books,
Fight Like a Physicist: Make Physics Your Advantage in the
NEW AND NOTABLE
CLIMATE CHANGE: What Everyone Needs to Know. Joseph Romm. One
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
Many thanks for the article by Larry Kusche (a member
THE LAST LAUGH
March 3, 1951: Watch Mr. Wizard premieres on WNBQ in