IT
  
Attualmente si sta visualizzando la versione Italy del sito.
Volete passare al vostro sito locale?
21 TEMPO DI LETTURA MIN

Burzynski Update: Texas Hearings End, Judges Sifting Evidence

ROBERT BLASKIEWICZ

August 2016 saw the end of arguments in the administrative hearing following disturbing allegations by the Texas Medical Board about Stanislaw Burzynski’s Houston cancer clinic. Burzynski, the discoverer, manufacturer, sole U.S. prescriber, and sole U.S. dispenser of a cancer treatment he calls “antineoplastons,” has been treating patients with his unproven therapy for forty years. For the past two decades, Burzynski has administered his drug under the auspices of dozens of FDA-approved clinical trials, none of which has been able to answer whether or not antineoplastons are effective. Participation in the trials, which are generally not covered by insurance, can cost patients hundreds of thousands of dollars. (See “The Burzynski Battles: Four Decades of Unproven Cancer Cure Claims,” SI, March/April 2014.)

A complaint was filed in December 2013 by the Texas Medical Board following an FDA investigation, which found the clinical trials in a breathtakingly poor state. The original complaint was expanded to some 200 pages of allegations in July of 2014, though they have since been pared down for concision. The Board staff alleged that Burzynski failed to meet the standard of care with nontherapeutic prescribing, abetted the practice of medicine by unlicensed personnel, denied patients informed consent, failed to disclose relevant pharmacy and lab ownership interests to patients, billed improperly and demanded retainers, practiced deceptive marketing, committed a host of failures to protect patients, kept inadequate records, and failed to adhere to protocols in his clinical trials.

Leggete l'articolo completo e molti altri in questo numero di Skeptical Inquirer
Opzioni di acquisto di seguito
Se il problema è vostro, Accesso per leggere subito l'articolo completo.
Singolo numero digitale Nov Dec 2016
 
€3,49 / issue
Questo numero e altri numeri arretrati non sono inclusi in un nuovo abbonamento. Gli abbonamenti comprendono l'ultimo numero regolare e i nuovi numeri pubblicati durante l'abbonamento. Skeptical Inquirer
Abbonamento digitale annuale €19,99 fatturati annualmente
Risparmiare
5%
€3,33 / issue

Questo articolo è...


View Issues
Skeptical Inquirer
Nov Dec 2016
VISUALIZZA IN NEGOZIO

Altri articoli in questo numero


Editor’s Letter
Letter from the Editor
We conclude our fortieth anniversary celebration of the Skeptical Inquirer
NEWS AND COMMENT
Chemtrails? In First Peer-Reviewed Published Survey, Atmospheric Scientists Say No
The news undoubtedly won’t faze committed “chemtrail” believers who long
Study Reveals How Witchcraft Harms Economies
Belief in magic is connected to a lack of economic
‘Ghostly’ Image at Haunted Stanley Hotel
A visitor to a famous—and famously haunted—hotel in Colorado claimed
Animas River Spill Spawns Conspiracy Theories
On August 5, 2015, contractors working for the U.S. Environmental
Woman Dies Searching for Monster
A young woman was killed in April 2016 outside of
Apollo Astronauts Claimed to Hear ‘Space Music’
A show that aired in February claimed that the Apollo
SPECIAL REPORT
Superstition Masquerading as Science
Psychiatrist Makes Devilishly Weak Case for Demonic Possession
INTERVIEW
Michael Mann and the Climate Wars
Physicist and CSI Fellow Mark Boslough interviewed noted climatologist and geophysicist Michael Mann, who will be speaking at CSICon Las Vegas
INVESTIGATIVE FILES
Dispelling Demons: Detective Work at The Conjuring House
Joe Nickell, PhD, is a skeptical demonologist. His many books
PSYCHIC VIBRATIONS
MUFON Gets into the Bigfoot Business
Sheaffer’s “Psychic Vibrations” column has appeared in the SKEPTICAL INQUIRER
THE SCIENCE OF SCIENCE COMMUNICATION
Winning the Vaccine War
Focus on Community-Based Strategies and Avoid Denigrating Parents
SKEPTICAL INQUIREE
‘M’ Is for Mysterious Marks
Benjamin Radford is a research fellow at the Committee for
NOTES ON A STRANGE WORLD
Houdini and the Cancer of Superstition
Massimo Polidoro is an investigator of the paranormal, lecturer, and
ODYSSEYS IN SCIENTIFIC SKEPTICISM
Bigfoot and I: Reflections on Forty Years of Skepticism
I needed a work-study job, and the new physical anthropologist
My Personal Odyssey in Skepticism
I discovered the Skeptical Inquirer shortly after its name change
From Tiny Acorns . . .
I was delighted to be invited to contribute to this
Spreading Skepticism
Recently, the science writer John Horgan took skeptics to task
A Glimpse Backward—and Forward—at Skepticism’s Big Tent
The Committee for Skeptical Inquiry and Skeptical Inquirer are celebrating
How I Got Hooked on the Skeptical World
Growing up in Salinas, California, during the 1970s, if you
The Day the World Changed . . . for Me
When I was twelve years old, UFOs were real. More
Skeptical Activism from the Bottom Up
For someone who may well be the only full-time skeptical
Committee for Skeptical Inquiry Timeline, 2001–2016
For the twenty-fifth anniversary observance of CSICOP (now CSI) and
ARTICLE
Nuclear Power and the Psychology of Evaluating Risk
Could it be that opponents of nuclear energy contribute to worsening global warming by failing to evaluate its risk rationally?
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
Geoffrey Dean’s SI article “Does Astrology Need to Be True?
THE LAST LAUGH
SKEPTICAL ANNIVERSARIES
November 4, 1936: After Richard S. Lambert was said to
PLACEBO BLOCKER