IT
  
Attualmente si sta visualizzando la versione Italy del sito.
Volete passare al vostro sito locale?
19 TEMPO DI LETTURA MIN

Veteran Bigfoot Chronicler John Green Dead at Eighty-Nine

MATTHEW CROWLEY

Longtime Bigfoot chronicler, advocate, and field researcher John Green has died. Green was so renowned within the Bigfoot subculture that he was elevated to a vaunted “Four Horseman” status, along with Peter Byrne, René Dahinden, and Grover Krantz—the latter two also deceased. His book On the Track of the Sasquatch was a seminal work; though not the first book on the subject, it was popular, and many of the arguments in support of the reality of Bigfoot were cemented there. The book, published in 1968, included an analysis of the centerpiece of Bigfoot advocacy, the 1967 Patterson-Gimlin film. Green later wrote two similarly short books, Year of the Sasquatch and The Sasquatch File. A much longer work, Sasquatch, the Apes Among Us, was published in 1978.

As well as an author, Green could claim credit as a legitimate Bigfoot field researcher, having participated in the Pacific Northwest Expedition following track finds in Northern California in the late 1950s. That expedition proved fruitless and was noted for fractious personal infighting among the participants.

Given that decades of searching for Bigfoot have yet to produce a definitive somatic sample in the form of a carcass, bones, or even hairs, Green and others were forced to argue the merits of other types of evidence. Green’s books were largely composed of anecdotes (some of which pushed the limits of credulity, in the sense that they could not be written off as cases of witness mistaken identity). Green strongly advocated that the Patterson-Gimlin film depicted a real animal. Here we see the genesis of memes within Bigfootery that continue to this day, one of which being that the film subject has arms impossibly long for a costumed actor to emulate. Indeed, Green doubled down on this claim, writing in a 2004 introductory preface to On the Track that “paradoxically, this silly attempt to prove that Patterson hoaxed his film led to the discovery that the movie itself has always contained proof that it does not show a man in a suit.”

Leggete l'articolo completo e molti altri in questo numero di Skeptical Inquirer
Opzioni di acquisto di seguito
Se il problema è vostro, Accesso per leggere subito l'articolo completo.
Singolo numero digitale September October 2016
 
€3,49 / issue
Questo numero e altri numeri arretrati non sono inclusi in un nuovo abbonamento. Gli abbonamenti comprendono l'ultimo numero regolare e i nuovi numeri pubblicati durante l'abbonamento. Skeptical Inquirer
Abbonamento digitale annuale €19,99 fatturati annualmente
Risparmiare
5%
€3,33 / issue

Questo articolo è...


View Issues
Skeptical Inquirer
September October 2016
VISUALIZZA IN NEGOZIO

Altri articoli in questo numero


Editor’s Letter
Letter from the Editor
To mark our fortieth anniversary, we invited distinguished scientists, scholars,
NEWS AND COMMENT
110 Nobel Laureate Scientists Urge Greenpeace to Drop Its Anti-GMO Stance
One of the biggest gaps between science and public perception
CSI’s Balles Prize in Critical Thinking Awarded to Julia Belluz of Vox.com
Let’s face it. Baseless alternative medicine and the people who
9/11 Conspiracy Crowdfunding Project Rises—and Falls
In May, a man named Paul Salo launched a crowdfunding
Pluto and Planets on 2016 U.S. Stamps
Discoveries about the planets and our most famous dwarf planet,
Skepticism at the Center: NECSS 2016
Manhattan’s Fashion Institute of Technology (FIT) isn’t the first place
INVESTIGATIVE FILES
Ley Lines: Investigating on Site
Joe Nickell, PhD, is a historical, paranormal, and forensic sleuth
PSYCHIC VIBRATIONS
‘UFO Disclosure’ Happening Again This Year
Sheaffer’s “Psychic Vibrations” column has appeared in the Skeptical Inquirer
NOTES ON A STRANGE WORLD
William Tell: Myth or Reality?
Massimo Polidoro is an investigator of the paranormal, lecturer, and
THE SCIENCE OF SCIENCE COMMUNICATION
The Science Literacy Paradox
Why Really Smart People Are Often the Most Biased in Their Opinions
BEHAVIOR & BELIEF
Fate: Inventing Reasons for the Things That Happen
Stuart Vyse is a psychologist and author of Believing in
SCIENCE WATCH
Dog Behavior: Beneath the Veneer of ‘Man’s Best Friend’
Kenneth W. Krause is a contributing editor and “Science Watch”
SKEPTICAL INQUIREE
Playing to an Empty Room: Ghost Hunting and ‘Singapore Theory’
Benjamin Radford is a research fellow at the Committee for
ISSUES IN SCIENCE & SKEPTICISM
Promote Reason, Prevent Climate Catastrophes: Let’s Get ’Er Done
We had another Reason Rally in Washington, DC, this year
What Science Is and How and Why It Works
If you cherry-pick scientific truths to serve cultural, economic, religious,
Why Skepticism?
Twenty years ago, I became actively involved in the skeptical
Science and Skepticism
“ These are the times that try men’s souls.” This
How Can Skepticism Do Better?
I am delighted to contribute an essay to celebrate the
Time to Upgrade the Skeptical Operating System. Reboot.
Around 1992, I discovered a new sphere to explore— skeptical
Why I Am Optimistic about the Future of Skepticism
I have always been somewhat skeptical. Even when I was
Authority and Skepticism
When I was a child, the conversations around the dinner
The Better Angels of Our Nature vs. the Internet
For 99 percent of the past several hundred thousand years
Skepticism Evolves—and So Does the Paranormal
It is easy to find milestones in the history of
Alternative Medicine Is a Playground for Apologists
“ What will you do if your conventional medical colleagues
REVIEWS
Our Conspiracy-Generating Brains
Suspicious Minds: Why We Believe Conspiracy Theories. By Rob Brotherton
Why Science and Religion are Irreconcilable
Faith vs. Fact: Why Science and Religion Are Incompatible. By
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
In “Creators of the Paranormal” (May/June 2016), Joe Nickell refutes
THE LAST LAUGH
SKEPTICAL ANNIVERSARIES
September 1976: The mystery-mongering TV series In Search Of… first
GENETIC TESTING