IT
  
Attualmente si sta visualizzando la versione Italy del sito.
Volete passare al vostro sito locale?
43 TEMPO DI LETTURA MIN

Teaching Skepticism: How Early Can We Begin?

SCOTT O. LILIENFELD

I trust that I need not persuade readers of Skeptical Inquirer that in today’s world of post-truth, alternative facts, and rampant pseudoscience, critical thinking—reasoning that helps to compensate for our biases—is needed now more than ever. Concerted efforts to dispel erroneous beliefs, as exemplified by the articles in each issue of this magazine, are essential to this mission. To effectively disseminate critical thinking to the broader populace, though, we may need to start earlier in our educational efforts than we have commonly assumed, perhaps as early as childhood.

Critical thinking and its close cousin, scientific thinking, do not come naturally to the human species (McCauley 2011). Hence, it is no surprise that many people, even those with high levels of education and intelligence, are not adept at evaluating claims with a skeptical mindset, one that requires us to maintain an open mind to novel claims while demanding persuasive evidence. In principle, there could even be a sensitive period for teaching critical thinking in childhood; once this window closes, critical thinking may be even more difficult to acquire. Still, developmental and educational psychologists know remarkably little about whether this is the case and if so, when we should begin to teach the rudiments of skepticism to children (see Scott O. Lilienfeld, “How Can Skepticism Do Better?,” Skeptical Inquirer, September/October 2016). As a consequence, we do not know whether laudable efforts to expose young children to critical thinking skills (such as the Junior Skeptic feature in Skeptic magazine) are worthwhile. Perhaps we need to wait until children’s cognitive capacities, such as their ability to think abstractly, are better developed. After all, as the great Swiss psychologist Jean Piaget noted, children are not merely “tiny adults.” They often think about the world in qualitatively different (that is, different in kind rather than degree) ways from grown-ups.

Leggete l'articolo completo e molti altri in questo numero di Skeptical Inquirer
Opzioni di acquisto di seguito
Se il problema è vostro, Accesso per leggere subito l'articolo completo.
Singolo numero digitale September October 2017
 
€3,49 / issue
Questo numero e altri numeri arretrati non sono inclusi in un nuovo abbonamento. Gli abbonamenti comprendono l'ultimo numero regolare e i nuovi numeri pubblicati durante l'abbonamento. Skeptical Inquirer
Abbonamento digitale annuale €19,99 fatturati annualmente
Risparmiare
5%
€3,33 / issue

Questo articolo è...


View Issues
Skeptical Inquirer
September October 2017
VISUALIZZA IN NEGOZIO

Altri articoli in questo numero


Editor’s Letter
The Spectrum of Skepticism
The concerns of scientific skeptics cover an astonishingly wide range
NEWS AND COMMENT
Understanding Gallup’s Latest Poll on Evolution
When a pollster that’s been surveying public opinion about evolution
CFI, Richard Dawkins, Teachers Slam as ‘Unconscionable’ Turkey’s Decision to Ban Teaching Evolution
Turkey already ranked even worse than the United States in
Psychic Roundup: ‘Psychics’ Convicted
The first few months of 2017 have not been good
Genetic Engineering through Music?
The Journal of Scientific Exploration (JSE) is one of the
INVESTIGATIVE FILES
Australia’s Storied Ghosts
Joe Nickell, PhD, is now well into his fifth decade
A MAGICIAN IN THE LAB
A Consistently Erroneous Technology
James Randi began his career as a stage magician and
NOTES ON A STRANGE WORLD
The Monster of Florence: Case Closed?
The Terrifying Story of the Most Infamous Ritual Murders in Italian History, Part 2
THE SCIENCE OF SCIENCE COMMUNICATION
Evolution in the College Classroom
Facilitating Conversations about Science and Religion
BEHAVIOR & BELIEF
P-Hacker Confessions: Daryl Bem and Me
Stuart Vyse is a psychologist and author of Believing in
SKEPTICAL INQUIREE
Orbs as Plasma Life
Benjamin Radford is a research fellow at the Committee for
SPECIAL REPORTS
Predatory Journals: Write, Submit, and Publish the Next Day
In 2012, journalist John Bohannon of the respected journal Science
FEATURES
THE POLITICIZATION of Scientific Issues
Looking through Galileo’s Lens or through the Imaginary Looking Glass
The Fakery of Electrodermal Screening
Souped-up galvanometers are being used to assess people’s health and determine what they supposedly need. Tests expose them as preposterous, and government agencies should stop their use
THE FALLACY FORK
Why It’s Time to Get Rid of Fallacy Theory
BIGFOOT AS BIG MYTH: 7 PHASES OF MYTHMAKING
During its history, the hairy man-beast has evolved through at least seven mythical embodiments
NEW AND NOTABLE
[NEW AND NOTABLE
Listing does not preclude future review
REVIEWS
A History of Physics Worth Fifty-One Thousand Words
In this little red book, Don S. Lemons has assembled
A Brilliant Climate Collaboration
President Trump—who has called climate change a “hoax” and has
Houdini’s Remarkable Female Detective
Rose Mackenberg was a female private detective in the 1920s,
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR ]
“Surviving the Misinformation Age” (May/June 2017) offered my incredulous skeptical