Shopping Cart -

Your cart is currently empty.
Upgrade to today
for only an extra Cxx.xx

You get:

plus This issue of xxxxxxxxxxx.
plus Instant access to the latest issue of 460+ of our top selling titles.
plus Unlimited access to 38000+ back issues
plus No contract or commitment. If you decide that PocketmagsPlus is not for you, you can cancel your monthly subscription online at any time. Auto-renews at €11,99 per month, unless cancelled.
Upgrade for €1.09
Then just €11,99 / month. Cancel anytime.
Learn more
Pocketmags Digital Magazines
IT
Pocketmags Digital Magazines
   You are currently viewing the Italy version of the site.
Would you like to switch to your local site?
Leggi ovunque Read anywhere
Modalità di pagamento Pocketmags Payment Types
Trusted site
A Pocketmags si ottiene
Fatturazione sicura
Ultime offerte
Web & App Reader
Regali
Loyalty Points
48 MIN READ TIME

Strange Songs from the Fringe

BRIAN REGAL

When odd birds sing their strange songs, does it change the forest? Do others, who don’t know any better, mimic those songs until the forest is filled with dissonance? This is an important question when it comes to science, history, and scholarship in general in Trump-era America. We used to be able to notice the odd birds, think them interesting or not, then move on to proper work based upon facts and evidence. Now the highest echelons of our government tilt their ears to hear the weird peeping and smile in agreement. Sharon Hill’s new book Scientifical Americans: The Culture of Amateur Paranormal Researchers addresses this issue at an important time.

Scientifical Americans: The Culture of Amateur Paranormal Researchers. By Sharon Hill. Mc-Farland, Jefferson, N.C., 2017. ISBN-13: 978-1476672472. 277 pp. Kindle edition, $18.99; paperback, $35.

Chasing enthusiasts of the paranormal is like chasing ghosts. They flit about and reside in the darkened corners of rationality. When they do appear we almost need to look at them from the corner of our eyes rather than directly, as a direct view doesn’t really provide clarity. Despite this, Hill has done an excellent job of analyzing the myriad realms and compartments of paranormal studies. What ties them—and this book—together is their attempts to pursue their quarry according to the rules of academic science and scholarly research despite most of them having little more than a nodding acquaintance with it. The results, sometimes serious and sometimes ridiculous, are what bring us to the notion of them being “sciencey.” One way historians define pseudoscience is that practitioners give a superficial gloss of science to their work though it is not really proper science. Their results are, as Hill says, scientifical rather than scientific. They separate themselves consciously from the mainstream, but they also self-segregate into different disciplines. There is little interdisciplinarity in the world of sciencey studies; UFOlogists, for example, rarely sit down with ghost hunters or flat-Earthers to compare notes.

Read the complete article and many more in this issue of Skeptical Inquirer
Purchase options below
If you own the issue, Login to read the full article now.
Single Digital Issue Skeptical Inquirer March/April 2018
 
€2,99
This issue and other back issues are not included in a new Skeptical Inquirer subscription. Subscriptions include the latest regular issue and new issues released during your subscription.
Annual Digital Subscription €16,99 billed annually
Save
5%
€16,99

This article is from...


View Issues
Skeptical Inquirer
Skeptical Inquirer March/April 2018
VIEW IN STORE

Other Articles in this Issue


Editor’s Letter
When CSICOP and the Skeptical Inquirer were founded, in 1976,
NEWS AND COMMENT
A staple of science fiction has always been aliens from
In December 2017, The New York Times reported on the
It resembles a scene from a James Bond film. Between
A committee of twenty Cuban scientists tasked with examining the
Six new fellows have been elected to the Committee for
It’s finally happened. Homeopathic remedies are going to come under
Julie Payette is far from your usual bureaucratic official. Even
New Mexico has a vibrant scientific co mmunity, with two
COMMENTARY
I have often written in the Skeptical Inquirer about how
CONFERENCE REPORT
A Festival of Scientific Skepticism or a Theme Park for Science and Reason? CSICon Las Vegas 2017 Had It All
Center for Inquiry (CFI) Communications Director Paul Fidalgo covered CSICon 2017 “live” for CFI Live in a series of brief reports on CFI’s website. Here are a few selections. (For others, go to centerforinquiry.live/2017.)
INVESTIGATIVE FILES
David Dominé is author of a series of three books
THE SCIENCE OF SCIENCE COMMUNICATION
Harnessing the Power of Opinion-Leaders across Communities
BEHAVIOR & BELIEF
Let us stipulate that there is no magic. Sleight-of-hand, deception,
SKEPTICAL INQUIREE
Q: “I enjoyed your recent investigation into the 2016 Mall
FEATURES
The decades-long academic assault on science has bewildered the American public about the role and function of science, promoted anti-intellectualism, and politically empowered purveyors of supernaturalism and paranormal beliefs
There are several flagrant examples of hype from cancer and cardiac therapy. The drugs Avastin and Opdivo, which have serious problems, have been greatly overhyped. Statins, which are effective in saving lives from heart attacks and stroke, have been subjected to negative hype meant to discourage their use
Here’s a geologist’s critical analysis of false perceptions held by many creationists about the origin of the Grand Canyon and the age of the Earth
Rather than creating a glorious new literature of positive art, Colin Wilson delivered an odd mix of dodgy philosophy, pulp novels, and paranormal studies—the latter often downright silly
REVIEWS
For most of human history, people have assumed that some
NEW AND NOTABLE
Listing does not preclude future review
You Are the Universe: Discovering Your Cosmic Self and Why
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
In Jeffrey Debies-Carl’s conspiracy legends article in the November/December 2017
THE LAST LAUGH
I’m not sure I get the point of the story