Shopping Cart -

Your cart is currently empty.
Continue Shopping
This website use cookies and similar technologies to improve the site and to provide customised content and advertising. By using this site, you agree to this use. To learn more, including how to change your cookie settings, please view our Cookie Policy
Pocketmags Digital Magazines
Pocketmags Digital Magazines
   You are currently viewing the Italy version of the site.
Would you like to switch to your local site?
Digital Subscriptions > The Hedge Fund Journal > Issue 132 – May 2018 > Trium Morphic ESG Long/Short UCITS

Trium Morphic ESG Long/Short UCITS

Enhancing fundamental analysis with ESG


Morphic Asset Management (Morphic)’s co-CIOs, Chad Slater and Jack Lowenstein, have been fundamental investors, selectively employing ESG factors, for 10 and 20 years respectively, and have been shorting since they set up Morphic in 2012. In March 2018, they launched the daily dealing Trium Morphic global equity long/ short UCITS fund, with discounted fees for the founders’ share class.

The top ten holdings look very different from those of many ESG and other global hedge funds, due to Morphic’s Asian and mid-cap focus, its distinguished investment process, and its distinctive approach to ESG. Morphic adds ESG factors to its fundamental investment process and ESG considerations somewhat constrain the investment universe. Longs must satisfy minimum ESG standards and shorts are generally of the lower rated ‘corporate citizens’ whilst consciously not shorting ‘better ESG citizens’.

For example, Tesla is a popular holding amongst some types of ESG investors, but it would fail both Morphic’s valuation criteria, and the ‘G’ for Governance in its ESG criteria, due to issues including the board of directors and the Solar City merger. Unlike many hedge fund managers, Morphic would not short Tesla however, “as that would drive up the cost of capital for a firm that is performing a social good in developing the electric car industry,” argues Slater, who began his career as an economist in Australia’s Treasury Department.

In broad-brush terms, Morphic will refrain from shorting firms ranked in the top ESG quartile and avoid buying those in the lowest ESG quartile. Some entire industries are excluded from the long book and Slater acknowledges that some companies with poor ESG scores, including so called ‘sin stocks’, have in fact been good investments though points to research from Statman and Glushkov (2016) that showed ESG investing can outperform despite excluding these ‘sin stocks’. Other poor corporate citizens have also disappointed shareholders.

Purchase options below
Find the complete article and many more in this issue of The Hedge Fund Journal - Issue 132 – May 2018
If you own the issue, Login to read the full article now.
Single Issue - Issue 132 – May 2018
Or 12999 points
6 Month Digital Subscription
Only € 140,00 per issue
Or 69999 points

View Issues

About The Hedge Fund Journal

Informing the Hedge Fund Community. With access to some of the industry’s biggest names and an astute and talented group of writers and contributors, The Hedge Fund Journal has established itself as a trusted source of information on the hedge fund industry.