Shopping Cart -

Your cart is currently empty.
Continue Shopping
This website use cookies and similar technologies to improve the site and to provide customised content and advertising. By using this site, you agree to this use. To learn more, including how to change your cookie settings, please view our Cookie Policy
Pocketmags Digital Magazines
Pocketmags Digital Magazines
   You are currently viewing the United Kingdom version of the site.
Would you like to switch to your local site?
Digital Subscriptions > Prospect Magazine > November 2016 > Spinning beyond Brexit

Spinning beyond Brexit

Globalisation has gone into reverse before—but don’t assume it will happen again

In the 1990s, globalisation was often characterised as inevitable and irreversible. Politicians like Bill Clinton and Tony Blair saw it as the unstoppable wave of the future and sought to ride it for all it was worth. Today that sense of inevitability has been cast into doubt, and the question being asked is whether our own era of globalisation could soon be undone, just as a remarkable earlier era of economic integration across political borders at the turn of the 20th century—which also affected trade, migration and investment—came unstuck during the era of the two world wars.

In the United States presidential campaign, Donald Trump’s pledge to resist new trade deals and renounce existing ones has forced Hillary Clinton, as a rear-guard electoral action, to reverse her previous support for the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement. The victory of “Leave” in the British referendum on European Union membership is likewise held up as foretelling the end of 21st-century globalisation. “Brexit,” the former World Bank economist Homi Kharas lamented in Newsweek, “represents the first tangible retreat from globalisation in my lifetime.”

In this view, Brexit is a manifestation of a mounting backlash against ever-deeper international entanglements in general, not just entanglements with the EU. It reflects the sense that, with all the dismantling of national economic controls, and the ceding of power over trade and the like to global bodies such as the World Trade Organisation (WTO) the nation state has fundamentally lost control of its destiny, surrendering to anonymous global forces. And what is true of Britain is true of other countries such as France, Germany and Sweden, where the ultra-right Front National, the anti-euro Alternative für Deutschland (Alternative for Germany, or AfD) and the anti-immigrant Sweden Democrats are all capitalising on the same populist, nationalist, and anti-globalisation sentiment. Their growing support is cited as evidence that globalisation is poised to shift into reverse.

One reason for taking these predictions with a pinch of salt is that we have heard them before. In 2002, the economic historian Harold James published The End of Globalization, in which he pointed to the collapse of international trade and payments in the 1930s and warned that the same could happen again. In 2005, Niall Ferguson argued in Foreign Affairs that conflicts like those in Iraq and Afghanistan and the tensions between China and the US in the South China Sea could sink globalisation, just as the geopolitical conflicts culminating in the First World War had caused German U^Boats to sink millions of tons of ocean shipping in a violent end to the pre-1914 era of globalisation.

Purchase options below
Find the complete article and many more in this issue of Prospect Magazine - November 2016
If you own the issue, Login to read the full article now.
Single Issue - November 2016
Or 499 points
Annual Digital Subscription
Only £ 4.00 per issue
Or 3999 points

View Issues

About Prospect Magazine

In Prospect’s November issue: Sam Tanenhaus argues Donald Trump is a consequence of the American government ignoring the people—and they’ll have to deal with his impact whether he wins or loses the presidential election. Diane Roberts explores the rage eating America by looking at the people that government has failed. Switching the focus to the UK, David Marquand and a quartet of commentators assess Labour’s position—with varying conclusions. Also in this issue: Matthew Qvortrup looks at the relationship between Angela Merkel and Vladimir Putin, two of Europe’s most important politicians whose lives have long been intertwined. Andy Burnham, Labour’s candidate for the mayor of Manchester, lays down the reasons why the northern powerhouse is so important and Prospect’s Arts and Books Editor Sameer Rahim reviews Zadie Smith’s latest novel.