US
139 MIN READ TIME

ECONOMICS AFTER NEOLIBERAL ISM

We live in an age of astonishing inequality. Income and wealth disparities in the United States have risen to heights not seen since the Gilded Age and are among the highest in the developed world. Median wages for U.S. workers have stagnated for nearly fifty years. Fewer and fewer younger Americans can expect to do better than their parents. Racial disparities in wealth and well-being remain stubbornly persistent. In 2017 life expectancy in the United States declined for the third year in a row, and the allocation of healthcare looks both inefficient and unfair. Advances in automation and digitization threaten greater labor market disruptions in the years ahead. Climate change–fueled disasters increasingly disrupt everyday life.

We believe that these are solvable problems—at the very least, that we can make serious headway on them. But addressing them will require a broad public discussion of new policy ideas. Social scientists have a responsibility to be part of this discussion. And economists have an indispensable role to play. Indeed, they have already started to play it. Economics is in a state of creative ferment that is often invisible to outsiders. While the sociology of the profession—career incentives, norms, socialization patterns—often militates against engagement with the policy world, a sense of public responsibility is bringing people into the fray.

Read the complete article and many more in this issue of Boston Review
Purchase options below
If you own the issue, Login to read the full article now.
Single Digital Issue Economics After Neoliberalism (Summer 2019)
 
$11.99 / issue
This issue and other back issues are not included in a new subscription. Subscriptions include the latest regular issue and new issues released during your subscription. Boston Review

This article is from...


View Issues
Boston Review
Economics After Neoliberalism (Summer 2019)
VIEW IN STORE

Other Articles in this Issue


Boston Review
ECONOMICS AFTER NEOLIBERAL ISM
This publication was made possible by a generous grant from The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation
EDITOR’S NOTE
NEAR THE END of Capitalism and Freedom (1962), Milton
FORUM RESPONSES
ECONOMICS IS THE MATERIALITY OF MORAL CHOICE
FOR NON-ECONOMISTS on the left, “Economics After Neoliberalism”
ECONOMICS AFTER PARTISANSHIP
A DEFINING FEATURE of Naidu, Rodrik, and Zucman’s essay
IN DEFENSE OF NEOLIBERALISM
SINCE COMPLAINTS about the domination of market fundamentalism
MARKETS ARE POLITICAL
LIKE NAIDU, RODRIK, AND ZUCMAN, I celebrate the advantages
WHAT ABOUT DEVELOPING COUNTRIES?
AFTER NEARLY FOUR YEARS of working as chief economic
TRADE RESTRICTIONS WILL NOT ACHIEVE ETHICAL GLOBALIZATION
I WOULD LIKE TO FOCUS on Dani Rodrik’s scheme to combat
INCLUSIVE PROSPERITY FOR GLOBAL SUPPLY CHAINS
STRONG, INDEPENDENT LABOR MOVEMENTS have always been
A TRANSDISCIPLINARY APPROACH
(Eric Beinhocker, W. Brian Arthur, Robert Axtell, Jenna Bednar, Jean-Philippe Bouchaud, David Colander, Molly Crockett, J. Doyne Farmer, Ricardo Hausmann, Cars Hommes, Alan Kirman, Scott Page, and David Sloan Wilson)
“ILLIBERAL” ECONOMICS
“ECONOMICS AFTER NEOLIBERALISM” describes an economics
THE PERILS OF QUANTIFICATION
ECONOMICS STANDS DEEPLY COMMITTED to quantification
EMPIRICISM’S IMPLICIT BIAS
NAIDU, RODRIK, AND ZUCMAN are on the cutting edge of
ECONOMISTS SHOULD ENABLE DEMOCRATIC PRIORITIES
THE RESPONSES IN THIS FORUM are too insightful to engage
ESSAYS
SELLING KEYNESIANISM
“LET’S BRING OUR EDITORIAL MICROSCOPE into focus on
EVERYDAY ECONOMISTS
HOW DO WE TALK about economics? Robert Manduca’s essay
WHO OWNS CORPORATIONS?
IN 1962 MILTON FRIEDMAN- the economist who, more than
THE FALSE PROMISE OF ENLIGHTENMENT
WE NEED METAPHORS to make sense of reality. But we
FREE SPEECH, INCORPORATED
THE FIRST AMENDMENT has long been celebrated as the
CONTRIBUTORS
Samuel Bowles is Arthur Spiegel Research Professor