Shopping Cart -

Your cart is currently empty.
Continue Shopping
This website use cookies and similar technologies to improve the site and to provide customised content and advertising. By using this site, you agree to this use. To learn more, including how to change your cookie settings, please view our Cookie Policy
Pocketmags Digital Magazines
Pocketmags Digital Magazines

Where do Democrats go from here?

Hillary Clinton was a flawed candidate who never connected with the whole of America. How do progressives make sure they get it right next time, asks Sam Tanenhaus

What Happened

The one enduring truth of American politics is that no one really understands how it works, which doesn’t stop many (me included) from thinking they do. A year ago the smart money was on Hillary Clinton to win the US presidential election in a big way. There was excited speculation of a redrawn election map, with longtime red (Republican) states turning blue (Democrat). “Could Hillary Clinton Win Texas?” the New York Times wondered two weeks before election day. (In the end she lost it by nine points— far better than Obama in 2012, but not close.) There were also hopes she might sweep in a fresh tide of Democrats in the national elections held on the same day. But she didn’t. Republicans held onto their small majority in the Senate and won the popular vote for the House of Representatives by 1.4m.

The worst misreading was of the main result. With less than a month to go, Clinton’s lead in the polls was nearing 10 points— landslide proportions. In the end, she did win the popular vote, by about two points—some three million votes. It was a small but decisive margin, but her biggest victories came in two giant states—New York and California—and weren’t enough to offset her narrow defeats elsewhere.

This strange and at times surreal election gave us the same muddled outcome US elections often do. And it pitted the same groups against one another. Democrats owned the coasts and the cities. Republicans ruled the heartland and small towns. The suburbs were up for grabs. If, in an electorate totalling 130m, 39,000 voters in three rust belt states (Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin) had changed their minds, Clinton would be president today.

Purchase options below
Find the complete article and many more in this issue of Prospect Magazine - November 2017
If you own the issue, Login to read the full article now.
Single Issue - November 2017
Or 499 points
Annual Digital Subscription
Only $ 4.10 per issue
Or 4099 points

View Issues

About Prospect Magazine

In Prospect’s November issue: Joris Luyendijk and Stuart Ward try to uncover the way Britain is perceived by Europe and the rest of the world. Luyendijk—who lived in Britain for six years before recently moving back to his native Netherlands—explains that the Brexit vote has shown Europe that Britain needs time alone to find its identity again, while Ward—a native Australian—argues that its Britain’s imperial backstory that stops it from truly understanding what the world thinks of it. Elsewhere in the issue Jeffrey Lewis argues that US foreign policy has helped North Korea develop the nuclear bomb and we explore the effect that the Palestinian museum near Ramallah is having on the creation of a national identity. Also in this issue: Sameer Rahim profiles Armando Iannucci, Joseph Stiglitz on Britain’s tricky political situation.