Shopping Cart -

Your cart is currently empty.
Continue Shopping
This website use cookies and similar technologies to improve the site and to provide customised content and advertising. By using this site, you agree to this use. To learn more, including how to change your cookie settings, please view our Cookie Policy
Pocketmags Digital Magazines
Pocketmags Digital Magazines

Clash of Perspectives

In the letters column of the September/October SI, reader Norman Carlson accuses me of being untrustworthy, unintelligent, lobotomized, lacking in virtue, and entitled, and he perhaps accuses the skeptical movement of prostitution as well (he says liberals have “smothered and prostituted” the skeptical movement).

It is unclear whether Mr. Carlson read my letter, which presents not my ideas but those of Bruce Fleming, from Fleming’s book Why Liberals and Conservatives Clash, many within quotation marks. I found Mr. Fleming’s ideas to be interesting, suggestive of further lines of thought, and entertaining, but I have no way to know whether they are valid or true; it would take social science research to determine whether Fleming’s analysis describes how people really think, and if so whether it can differentiate liberals from conservatives—and if so, to what percentage of the liberal and conservative population it applies. Someone would also have to define liberal and conservative; Mr. Fleming says that liberals are always open to discussing things, but that isn’t how Mr. Carlson sees me.

Purchase options below
Find the complete article and many more in this issue of Skeptical Inquirer - January February 2018
If you own the issue, Login to read the full article now.
Single Issue - January February 2018
Or 299 points
Annual Digital Subscription
Only $ 2.83 per issue
Or 1699 points

View Issues

About Skeptical Inquirer

A SKEPTIC'S GUIDE TO RACISM Critical Thinking Approaches to Confronting Racism Why Pseudoscience Should Be Taught in College A Cancer Nurse Examines Alternative Medicine

Other Articles in this Issue