US
86 MIN READ TIME

The Virtuous Skeptic

MASSIMO PIGLIUCCI

What is skepticism? And how should a good skeptic approach her commitment to the field? These are crucial questions that most of us take for granted but that—I think—are worth pause to ponder and reevaluate from time to time. Which is what I intend to do in this article, introducing readers to an approach called “virtue epistemology,” which has much to say of relevance to the conscientious skeptic.

The ethos of the modern skeptical movement, the one that traces its origins to Paul Kurtz and others in the 1970s, is perhaps best encapsulated by the phrase “extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence,” popularized by Carl Sagan but first articulated by Marcello Truzzi as “an extraordinary claim requires an extraordinary proof.” Both versions, in turn, owe much to two illustrious antecedents: Pierre-Simon Laplace, who in 1812 wrote: “The weight of evidence for an extraordinary claim must be proportioned to its strangeness,” and David Hume, who said in 1748: “A wise man . . . proportions his belief to the evidence.”

Skepticism has evolved over the past several decades, expanding the circle of its concerns and therefore the type of claims it considers “extraordinary” and thus in need of proportional evidence in order to be verified. Moreover, skepticism has developed nationally and internationally as a powerful grassroots movement for the advocacy of science and critical thinking more generally. Broadly speaking, we can distinguish between those areas of inquiry that fall under “classic” skepticism—which include astrology, UFOlogy, psychics, paranormal experiences, ghosts, Bigfoot, and the like—and those additional issues that have contributed to evolve contemporary skepticism: intelligent design creationism, vaccine denialism, climate change denialism, and so forth. Some skeptics have even ventured into criticism of areas of academic research and scholarship, such as the replicability issue in psychology and the social sciences, the debate about the value of string theory in physics, and the general usefulness of philosophy.

Read the complete article and many more in this issue of Skeptical Inquirer
Purchase options below
If you own the issue, Login to read the full article now.
Single Digital Issue March April 2017
 
$2.99 / issue
This issue and other back issues are not included in a new subscription. Subscriptions include the latest regular issue and new issues released during your subscription. Skeptical Inquirer
Annual Digital Subscription $16.99 billed annually
Save
5%
$2.83 / issue

This article is from...


View Issues
Skeptical Inquirer
March April 2017
VIEW IN STORE

Other Articles in this Issue


FROM THE EDITOR
CSICon in Limelight, The Selfish Gene Revisited
“... promotes scientific inquiry, critical investigation, and the use of
NEWS AND COMMENT
cfi CENTER FOR INQUIRY
Center for Inquiry and Richard Dawkins Foundation Now Formally Merged
FTC Will Regulate Marketing of Homeopathic Drugs
An agency of the federal government is finally taking systematic
CONFERENCE REPORT
CSICON LAS VEGAS: CONFERENCE REPORT
CSICOP invented the skeptics’ conference. Over the past four decades,
CSICon 2016 Lights Up Las Vegas
Can one be simultaneously dazzled and disabused? Indulging in flights
The Enlightenment Wrapped Up in an Organizational Package
Excerpts from Center for Inquiry CEO Robyn Blumner's welcoming remarks at CSICon 2016 Las Vegas
Maria Konnikova on Stories as a Force for Evil
I used to make my living as a stage actor,
Fake News: Tamar Wilner Is the Hero We Need
On the plane ride to Las Vegas, I took the
Jill Tarter: E.T. Whisperer, Possible Martian Descendant
It used to be that we meager humans had no
Mass Misinformation Author David Helfand Warns of ‘Google-Fed Zombies’
We human beings, thanks to the Internet, are producing 2.5
The Amazing Cosmos of Gravitational Waves
Physicist, cosmologist, and CSI Fellow Lawrence Krauss of Ari zona
Science Education, Communication on Display at CSICon
One of my favorite moments of CSICon came during Richard
INTERVIEW
Still ‘Amazing’: A Conversation with James Randi
The famous conjuror, investigator, and author—and founding fellow of CSICOP—sat
SPECIAL REPORT
The John Maddox Prize Nomination for Elizabeth Loftus
Here are extended excerpts from Goldsmiths College (University of London) psychology professor Chris French’s letter nominating Elizabeth Loftus for the 2016 John Maddox Prize (see News and Comment, p. 7)
FORUM
Let Your Questioning Start with Wikipedia
Do you remember January 18, 2012? That was the day
INVESTIGATIVE FILES
Miracle Tableau: Knock, Ireland, 1879
Joe Nickell, PhD, is CSI’s senior research fellow. He is
A MAGICIAN IN THE LAB
The Dangerous Delusion about Vaccines and Autism
James Randi began his career as a stage magician and
PSYCHIC VIBRATIONS
‘UFO Disclosure’ Fizzles Again in 2016
Robert Sheaffer has been writing the “Psychic Vibrations” column in
SCIENCE WATCH
The Delectable Myths of Healthy and Healthier Obesity
Kenneth W. Krause is a contributing editor and “Science Watch”
SKEPTICAL INQUIREE
Mystery of the Paulding Light
Benjamin Radford is a research fellow at the Committee for
FEATURES
THE SELFISH GENE REVISITED
On the fortieth anniversary of the book that made him
God’s Own Medicine
History’s unlearned lesson about opium-based pain relievers and addiction
Why Skepticism?
Sasquatch, Broken Windows, and Public Policy
Why We Believe—Long After We Shouldn’t
Our brains are wired for self-justification and dissonance-reduction. We can override that impulse by learning how to admit our mistakes and separate them from our self-esteem
REVIEWS
The Scientist and the Philosopher
Between Two Worlds: Memoirs of a Philosopher-Scientist. By Mario Bunge
What Ghosts Mean
Ghostly Encounters: The Hauntings of Everyday Life. By Dennis and
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
Letters to the Editor
In his excellent article on nuclear power (“Nuclear Power and
THE LAST LAUGH
THE LAST LAUGH