US
13 MIN READ TIME

General Nathan F. Twining and the Flying Disc Problem of 1947

ERIC WOJCIECHOWSKI

On September 23, 1947, an extraordinary letter titled “AMC Opinion Concerning ‘Flying Discs’” was signed by Lieutenant General Nathan F. Twining of the United States Air Material Command (AMC) and sent to Air Force Brigadier General George Schulgen per his request to understand what was going on regarding reports of “flying discs.” The extraordinary part was the conclusion that the flying discs were “something real and not visionary or fictitious.”

At the time, the United States was being inundated with reports of unidentified aircraft or flying saucers. World War II had recently ended, a Cold War was ramping up, and the world’s remaining powers were quickly developing new technologies to overtake one another (particularly the United States and Russia). As a result, when reports of unidentified strange aircraft were coming in, the U.S. military had to ensure a foreign threat wasn’t present.

In early July 1947, the Army Air Force Intelligence Collections Division, located in the Pentagon, began an investigation with Lieutenant George Garrett assigned to lead the gathering of information. After collecting several UFO reports, Lt. Garrett, with assistance from FBI liaison S.W. Reynolds, prepared an estimate document of the situation wherein they concluded that patterns in the sightings suggested real aircraft and questioned whether the UFOs were secret technology of the United States itself. The estimate was signed off by Lt. Garrett’s superior, Chief Collection Branch Colonel Robert Taylor III, and passed on to other military heads to inquire on the elusive disc’s origins.

Read the complete article and many more in this issue of Skeptical Inquirer
Purchase options below
If you own the issue, Login to read the full article now.
Single Digital Issue March April 2020
 
$2.99 / issue
This issue and other back issues are not included in a new subscription. Subscriptions include the latest regular issue and new issues released during your subscription. Skeptical Inquirer
Annual Digital Subscription $16.99 billed annually
Save
5%
$2.83 / issue

This article is from...


View Issues
Skeptical Inquirer
March April 2020
VIEW IN STORE

Other Articles in this Issue


FEATURES
BEWARE THE NATUROPATHIC CANCER Quack
Naturopathic medicine is not any kind of medicine, and its practitioners are nothing short of quacks. I know because I used to be one. Herein lies my story
How Good Are Past Predictions of Global Warming?
Critics of climate science claim that climate models lack predictive skill. In fact, some of the earliest predictions made thirty years ago have performed remarkably well
Dubious Claims in Psychotherapy for Youth Part II: Internalizing Issues
This is the second article in a three-part series about questionable ideas in child and adolescent psychotherapy. Topics in this installment relate to internalizing issues in youth and include naturopathic medicine for mania, dream interpretation for depression, fears about Bigfoot, superstitious rituals for anxiety, attachment parenting, and homeopathy for psychosis
CONFERENCE REPORT
From Fantasyland America to the Fabric of Space and Time
Celebrating Science and Probing Our Public Confusions
COMMENTARY
How to Win the New Climate War
“There is general scientific agreement that … mankind is influencing
SPECIAL REPORT
Believing in Science Is Not Understanding the Science: Brazilian Surveys
More Brazilians believe in the importance of vaccines than in
COLUMNS
Conversions, Courage, and Climate
Conversion stories—from people who held unsubstantiated beliefs but changed their
A Small Victory for Science in Suburban Philadelphia
In December 2019 in a suburb of Philadelphia, science enjoyed
‘Mysterious’ Drones Sighted over Colorado
As 2019 came to a close, news reports spread about
Record Heat Wave, Catastrophic Wildfires Hit Australia
Our special report “Hot Month, Hot Year, Hot Planet” in
Fifty-Year Performance of Climate Models: They Accurately Forecast Today’s Global Warming
In a feature article in this issue, veteran climate scientist
Lizzie Borden’s Eighty-One Whacks: Table-Tipping Testimony from a Spirit?
Joe Nickell, PhD, is CSI’s senior research fellow. A former
King Arthur Found?
Massimo Polidoro is an investigator of the paranormal, lecturer, and
In Praise of Uncertainty
Harriet Hall, MD, also known as “The SkepDoc,” is a
Are Atheists Sadder but Wiser?
Stuart Vyse is a psychologist and author of Believing in
The Mindful Climate Writer Finding My Voice in a Culture of Extremes
Matthew Nisbet is professor of communication, public policy and urban
Have I Ever Seen a Ghost?
Benjamin Radford is a research fellow at the Committee for
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
I read with interest Gary Bakker’s article promoting evidence-based guidelines
REVIEWS
The Hidden Biases Men Just Don’t See
Unlike many popular books on gender differences and conflicts, Invisible
No War between Science and Religion? Many Scientists Disagree
In the introduction to The Warfare between Science and Religion,
Truth Matters, and the Scientific Attitude Helps Find It
Science is under attack. The evidence for global warming is