Shopping Cart -

Your cart is currently empty.
Continue Shopping
This website use cookies and similar technologies to improve the site and to provide customised content and advertising. By using this site, you agree to this use. To learn more, including how to change your cookie settings, please view our Cookie Policy
Pocketmags Digital Magazines
Pocketmags Digital Magazines

Embracing Option D: Knowing When You Don’t Know

I am often asked to examine seemingly mysterious and inherently ambiguous photos. Usually the person asking has already settled—sometimes tentatively, more often strongly—on a specific interpretation. They know what the photo shows and want my independent confirmation that their favored interpretation is correct. That shadowy blur in the distant forest is a Bigfoot; that weird white orb—complete with faint facial features if you just magnify enough—is a ghost, and so on.

One of the first steps to analyzing a photograph, and more broadly a claim, is carefully distinguishing between what is known, what is suspected, and what is assumed. The three are often casually lumped together, but parsing them out is important. Usually key premises are possibilities instead of established fact. Considering alternative explanations is another part of the process.

Purchase options below
Find the complete article and many more in this issue of Skeptical Inquirer - March/April 2019
If you own the issue, Login to read the full article now.
Single Issue - March/April 2019
Or 299 points
Annual Digital Subscription
Only $ 2.83 per issue
Or 1699 points

View Issues

About Skeptical Inquirer

MEGAVITAMINS: Puffery vs Fact CSIcon 2018 Conference Report Respectful Skepticism The Dematerialization Crusade AND MUCH MORE...