We use cookies to track usage and preferences. See Cookie Policy
Pocketmags Digital Magazines
US
Pocketmags Digital Magazines
Christmas Presents

Scientists Urge Supreme Court: Reject Pseudoscientific Testimony for Texas Abortion Case

Eminent scientists and public intellectuals are backing the Center for Inquiry (CFI) in a brief to the Supreme Court criticizing the state of Texas’s onerous restrictions on abortion providers. CFI’s brief argues that the alleged expert scientific testimony used to justify the restrictions is flawed pseudoscience and the Court cannot constitutionally rely on it.

In Whole Woman’s Health v. Cole , plaintiffs argue that restrictions on abortion providers passed in Texas in 2013 impose an undue burden on women’s constitutionally protected right to end a pregnancy. Since only a few clinics are able to meet the law’s strictures, it will result in mass clinic closures and sharply restricted access to abortion services in the state.

READ MORE
Purchase options below
Find the complete article and many more in this issue of Skeptical Inquirer - May June 2016
If you own the issue, Login to read the full article now.
Single Issue - May June 2016
$2.99
Or 299 points
Annual Digital Subscription
Only $ 2.83 per issue
SAVE
5%
$16.99
Or 1699 points

View Issues

About Skeptical Inquirer

Creators of the Paranormal: A handful of twentieth-century figures “created” the modern concept of the paranormal and its leading topics, transporting fantasy, myth, or speculation into a kind of believable “reality.” Most proved to be a chimera. CRISPR-Cas9: Not Just Another Scientific Revolution Dissociation and Paranormal Beliefs Scientific Reasoning at the USAF Academy: An Examination into Titanium-Treated Necklaces Stick It In Your Ear! How Not To Do Science A Testament of Belief Masquerading as Science and much more...
Ways to Pay Pocketmags Payment Types
At Pocketmags you get Secure Billing Great Offers HTML Reader Gifting options Loyalty Points