Shopping Cart -

Your cart is currently empty.
Continue Shopping
This website use cookies and similar technologies to improve the site and to provide customised content and advertising. By using this site, you agree to this use. To learn more, including how to change your cookie settings, please view our Cookie Policy
Pocketmags Digital Magazines
Pocketmags Digital Magazines

Are Your Noncompete Agreements Dying of Old Age?

The importance of taking a regular and critical look

Key points

• Tight labor markets are leading courts and legislatures to closely scrutinize noncompetes and other restrictive covenants.

• If there are changes in an employee’s job and/ or the company’s business, it may be prudent to proactively amend or supplement the existing standardized documents to prophylactically further shield the company against threats to its customer relationships, employees and confidential information.

• Regular review and maintenance can help maximize employers’ ability to protect their businesses against breaches of former employees’ contractual agreements and unfair competition.

Noncompetition and other restrictive covenants provide valuable protection against unfair competition from departing employees. However, legal developments and changes in an employee’s job or the nature of the company’s competition can cause employers’ restrictive covenant agreements to become outdated and potentially unenforceable. Periodic review and maintenance of these agreements is crucial to ensure employers get the maximum available legal protection from theft of their customer base and business opportunity, employee talent and confidential information.

The effect of statutory changes Because they impede employees’ ability to change jobs freely, noncompetition agreements, as well as provisions barring solicitations of former customers or employees, often are subject to more stringent rules than ordinary contracts. Some states, like California, Oklahoma, Montana and North Dakota, effectively ban noncompetition agreements altogether outside the context of the sale of a business. Others, like Colorado, Georgia, Louisiana, Massachusetts and Oregon and soon Washington state, limit the types of workers to which they can apply or require that other elements be present.

Purchase options below
Find the complete article and many more in this issue of The Hedge Fund Journal - Issue 142 – Aug 2019
If you own the issue, Login to read the full article now.
Single Issue - Issue 142 – Aug 2019
Or 11999 points
6 Month Digital Subscription
Only $ 120.00 per issue
Or 59999 points

View Issues

About The Hedge Fund Journal

Informing the Hedge Fund Community. With access to some of the industry’s biggest names and an astute and talented group of writers and contributors, The Hedge Fund Journal has established itself as a trusted source of information on the hedge fund industry.