The Sickness of Insecurity |

Shopping Cart -

Your cart is currently empty.
Upgrade to today
for only an extra Cxx.xx

You get:

plus This issue of xxxxxxxxxxx.
plus Instant access to the latest issue of 300+ of our top selling titles.
plus Unlimited access to 27000+ back issues
plus No contract or commitment. If you decide that PocketmagsPlus is not for you, you can cancel your monthly subscription online at any time. Auto-renews at €10.99 per month, unless cancelled.
Upgrade Now for €10.99 Learn more
This website use cookies and similar technologies to improve the site and to provide customised content and advertising. By using this site, you agree to this use. To learn more, including how to change your cookie settings, please view our Cookie Policy
Pocketmags Digital Magazines
Pocketmags Digital Magazines
   You are currently viewing the European Union version of the site.
Would you like to switch to your local site?
Read anywhere Read anywhere
Ways to pay Pocketmags Payment Types
Trusted site
At Pocketmags you get
Secure Billing
Great Offers
Web & App Reader
Gifting Options
Loyalty Points

The Sickness of Insecurity

Three apparently unconnected things. A paper published by the Royal Society of Arts (RSA) and Royal Society of Arts Scotland adding to the growing debate about universal basic income (UBI) and, more generally, the way we think about social welfare. An article by blogger and iScot columnist, Jason Michael McCann, extolling the virtues of the ‘safe space’. And a former BBC China editor giving evidence to the House of Commons Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee inquiry into BBC pay.

What links these three things is the concept of security. Or, perhaps more pertinently, insecurity. Allow me to explain.

UBI, also called unconditional basic income, basic income guarantee, citizen’s income or any of several other names, is simply a form of social security involving all citizens being paid a regular, liveable and, crucially, unconditional payment independent of any other income. The idea has been around since the late 18th century and tends to divide people into two camps - those who cannot get past the notion of unaffordable ‘free money’ permitting (other) people to indulge their ‘natural’ disinclination to labour; and those who immediately see the benefits of doing away with the massive, complicated and expensive administrative costs associated with traditional social security systems.

The first category commonly focus on the cost to the state of providing every citizen with a basic income, the ‘illogic’ of giving money to wealthy individuals and the conviction that people would simply stop working. The second category point out that the simplicity of the system along with consequential benefits could actually reduce the cost of social security, that a properly progressive tax regime would make the system self-financing while automatically clawing back payments made to the rich and that people freed from the stress of inappropriate employment would be healthier and better able to realise their potential.

Purchase options below
Find the complete article and many more in this issue of iScot Magazine - March 2018
If you own the issue, Login to read the full article now.
Single Issue - March 2018
Or 549 points
Getting free sample issues is easy, but we need to add it to an account to read, so please follow the instructions to read your free issue today.
Email Address
Annual Digital Subscription
Only € 2.83 per issue
Or 3399 points
Monthly Digital Subscription
Only € 4.49 per issue
Or 449 points

View Issues

About iScot Magazine

March 2018 Issue number 39 The only independent Pro Scottish magazine on sale today