EU
  
You are currently viewing the European Union version of the site.
Would you like to switch to your local site?
27 MIN READ TIME

Animas River Spill Spawns Conspiracy Theories

BENJAMIN RADFORD

On August 5, 2015, contractors working for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) accidentally released about three million gallons of polluted mine wastewater into Colorado’s Animas River. The stew of toxic elements temporarily turned the river orange and caused concern for wildlife, farmers, tourism, and those who depend on the river for drinking water. Tests conducted three weeks after the spill found no harmful levels of any contaminants in the river, though many are concerned that the river’s sediments may be toxic and remain so for years to come.

Accidents and disasters—especially life-threatening ones, though the Animas spill is not known to have harmed anyone—often spawn conspiracy theories. The most popular theory claims that the EPA purposely polluted the river as a way to obtain extra funding available for cleanup; under this classic “follow the money” scenario, the EPA decided the best way to get free money for Superfund sites—as this could potentially be designated—was to create a disaster. As one typical conspiracy commenter opined (at http://tinyurl.com/okww4an), “I am thinking there were multiple reasons for something like this—funding, but also Agenda2—re-wilding of the west—they want most all of the US to be ‘NO HUMANS ALLOWED’ . . . plus if people get sick/die from the heavy metals in the process, it’s the sacrifice that must be made (from their perspective).”

Read the complete article and many more in this issue of Skeptical Inquirer
Purchase options below
If you own the issue, Login to read the full article now.
Single Digital Issue Nov Dec 2016
 
€3,49 / issue
This issue and other back issues are not included in a new subscription. Subscriptions include the latest regular issue and new issues released during your subscription. Skeptical Inquirer
Annual Digital Subscription €19,99 billed annually
Save
5%
€3,33 / issue

This article is from...


View Issues
Skeptical Inquirer
Nov Dec 2016
VIEW IN STORE

Other Articles in this Issue


Editor’s Letter
Letter from the Editor
We conclude our fortieth anniversary celebration of the Skeptical Inquirer
NEWS AND COMMENT
Burzynski Update: Texas Hearings End, Judges Sifting Evidence
August 2016 saw the end of arguments in the administrative
Chemtrails? In First Peer-Reviewed Published Survey, Atmospheric Scientists Say No
The news undoubtedly won’t faze committed “chemtrail” believers who long
Study Reveals How Witchcraft Harms Economies
Belief in magic is connected to a lack of economic
‘Ghostly’ Image at Haunted Stanley Hotel
A visitor to a famous—and famously haunted—hotel in Colorado claimed
Woman Dies Searching for Monster
A young woman was killed in April 2016 outside of
Apollo Astronauts Claimed to Hear ‘Space Music’
A show that aired in February claimed that the Apollo
SPECIAL REPORT
Superstition Masquerading as Science
Psychiatrist Makes Devilishly Weak Case for Demonic Possession
INTERVIEW
Michael Mann and the Climate Wars
Physicist and CSI Fellow Mark Boslough interviewed noted climatologist and geophysicist Michael Mann, who will be speaking at CSICon Las Vegas
INVESTIGATIVE FILES
Dispelling Demons: Detective Work at The Conjuring House
Joe Nickell, PhD, is a skeptical demonologist. His many books
PSYCHIC VIBRATIONS
MUFON Gets into the Bigfoot Business
Sheaffer’s “Psychic Vibrations” column has appeared in the SKEPTICAL INQUIRER
THE SCIENCE OF SCIENCE COMMUNICATION
Winning the Vaccine War
Focus on Community-Based Strategies and Avoid Denigrating Parents
SKEPTICAL INQUIREE
‘M’ Is for Mysterious Marks
Benjamin Radford is a research fellow at the Committee for
NOTES ON A STRANGE WORLD
Houdini and the Cancer of Superstition
Massimo Polidoro is an investigator of the paranormal, lecturer, and
ODYSSEYS IN SCIENTIFIC SKEPTICISM
Bigfoot and I: Reflections on Forty Years of Skepticism
I needed a work-study job, and the new physical anthropologist
My Personal Odyssey in Skepticism
I discovered the Skeptical Inquirer shortly after its name change
From Tiny Acorns . . .
I was delighted to be invited to contribute to this
Spreading Skepticism
Recently, the science writer John Horgan took skeptics to task
A Glimpse Backward—and Forward—at Skepticism’s Big Tent
The Committee for Skeptical Inquiry and Skeptical Inquirer are celebrating
How I Got Hooked on the Skeptical World
Growing up in Salinas, California, during the 1970s, if you
The Day the World Changed . . . for Me
When I was twelve years old, UFOs were real. More
Skeptical Activism from the Bottom Up
For someone who may well be the only full-time skeptical
Committee for Skeptical Inquiry Timeline, 2001–2016
For the twenty-fifth anniversary observance of CSICOP (now CSI) and
ARTICLE
Nuclear Power and the Psychology of Evaluating Risk
Could it be that opponents of nuclear energy contribute to worsening global warming by failing to evaluate its risk rationally?
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
Geoffrey Dean’s SI article “Does Astrology Need to Be True?
THE LAST LAUGH
SKEPTICAL ANNIVERSARIES
November 4, 1936: After Richard S. Lambert was said to
PLACEBO BLOCKER