US
9 MIN READ TIME

The Danger of Chromotherapy

Despite the lack of scientific evidence for its effectiveness and its use of esoteric theories to describe its mechanisms of action, chromotherapy has become popular. But is it safe?

C-state lighting technologies, light-emitting diodes (LEDs) will probably become the most used light sources in chromotherapy. Some LED-based chromotherapy lamps are already available on the market. The main interest in LED lamps—in addition to their energy efficiency and long lifetime—is that they can provide various colors directly depending on the nature of the semiconductor inside without using any filter. Is the use of LEDs in chromotherapy without any risk?

Blue Light Hazard

In the last quarter of the twentieth century, the work of Ham, Mueller, and Sliney (Sliney et al. 1976; Ham and Mueller 1989) opened the way to the description of photochemical mechanisms of lesions on the retina during exposure to a blue light source. To prevent such damages, the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (IC NIRP), in its “Guidelines on Limits of Exposure to Inco herent Visible and Infrared Radiation” (1989), defines a blue light action spectrum Bλ(λ) and exposure limits (expressed in radiance) that are used in IEC 62471, which is the stan dard when dealing with exposure to sources of broad spec trum incoherent optical radiations. The application of this standard is particularly justified for evaluating blue LED and white LED (also called White Phosphor Coated LED, or WPCLED, and made of a blue LED coated with phosphor), which combine high radiance and a blue-enhanced spectrum, as can be seen on Figure 1. In 2010, the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES) published a collective expert report making an up date on the blue light risk associated with the use of commer cially available blue and white LEDs (Rapport de l’ANSES 2010). The results showed that it was possible to buy white or blue LEDs lamps reaching the medium risk group (RG2), potentially harmful to the retina of the eye if not diverted in 0.25 seconds.

Read the complete article and many more in this issue of Skeptical Inquirer
Purchase options below
If you own the issue, Login to read the full article now.
Single Digital Issue July August 2017
 
$2.99 / issue
This issue and other back issues are not included in a new subscription. Subscriptions include the latest regular issue and new issues released during your subscription. Skeptical Inquirer
Annual Digital Subscription $16.99 billed annually
Save
5%
$2.83 / issue

This article is from...


View Issues
Skeptical Inquirer
July August 2017
VIEW IN STORE

Other Articles in this Issue


Editor’s Letter
Te Fires of Creationists, and Rallying for Science
You have to hand it to the creationists, especially the
NEWS AND COMMENT
Academies Report Urges Bolstered Efforts to Protect Integrity of Science
The scientific enterprise places high value on honesty and openness
A Scientist Pushes Psychology Journals toward Open Data
The March 9 Nature reported some disturbing news: “An editor
Burzynski Sanctioned by Texas Medical Board
On March 3, 2017, the Texas Medical Board sanctioned Houston
Hans Rosling Brought Data to Life, Showed Our Misconceptions about the World
Many skeptics outside Sweden first encountered Professor Hans Rosling at
Humanities, Too: In New Study, History Courses in Critical Thinking Reduce Pseudoscientific Beliefs
We often think of the need for critical thinking in
INVESTIGATIVE FILES
Murder by Darkness: Does Mammoth Cave’s Specter Harbor a Secret?
Joe Nickell, a former magician and private detective, did graduate
A MAGICIAN IN THE LAB
The Farce Known as ‘FC’
James Randi began his career as a stage magician and
NOTES ON A STRANGE WORLD
The Monster of Florence: Case Closed?
The Terrifying Story of the Most Infamous Ritual Murders in Italian History, Part 1
THE SCIENCE OF SCIENCE COMMUNICATION
The March for Science
Partisan Protests Put Public Trust in Scientists at Risk
BEHAVIOR & BELIEF
Can Anything Save Us from Unintended Consequences?
Stuart Vyse is a psychologist and author of Believing in
SKEPTICAL INQUIREE
The Phoenix Driveway Ghost
Benjamin Radford is a research fellow at the Committee for
FEATURES
FIRE-BREATHING DINOSAURS?
Physics, Fossils, and Functional Morphology vs. Pseudoscience
DID AUSTRALIA’S ABORIGINES SEE PLESIOSAURS? YES-IN A CHILDREN’S BOOK
To support their claim that humans and plesiosaurs coexisted, antievolution publications cite as evidence a plesiosaur painting by an artist of the Kuku Yalanji tribe of Australia. However, the painting is actually a copy of an illustration in a 1960 children’s book on dinosaurs
JonBenet Murder Mystery Solved? (Not by Psychics)
The death of six-year-old beauty queen JonBenet Ramsey went unsolved for two decades. Psychics were worse than useless, but the author’s proposed solution resulted from evaluating the best evidence
‘Psychic Detective’ Noreen Renier: The Grinch Who Stole Christmas from a Grieving Family
August 12, 1989, was to be a joyous day for
An Investigation of the Missing411 Conspiracy
In his “Missing411” series of books, author David Paulides claims that people are going missing from U.S. national parks under unusual circumstances and the National Park Service is obstructing attempts to investigate. What are the facts?
BALLES PRIZE
Maria Konnikova Wins CSI’s Balles Prize in Critical Thinking for The Confidence Game
In her acclaimed bestselling book The Confidence Game: Why We
REVIEWS
Why We Often Get Risks Wrong
Getting Risk Right: Understanding the Science of Elusive Health Risks
A Good Analysis of Bad UFO Information
By Robert Sheaffer. CreateSpace Independent Publishing, 2016. ISBN: 978-1519260840. 292
The Bigfoot Obsession
Monster Trek: The Obsessive Search for Bigfoot. By Joe Gisondi
NEW AND NOTABLE
[ NEW AND NOTABLE
Listing does not preclude future review
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
[ LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
Your March/April 2017 issue has provoked me to make an
THE LAST LAUGH
THE LAST LAUGH
Chat
X
Pocketmags Support