US
134 MIN READ TIME

Everything You Know about Being Rh-Negative Is Wrong

D. ELLEN K. TARR

The “+” or “-” following the ABO blood type indicates the presence or absence of a protein on the surface of human red blood cells (RBCs) that is referred to as the “Rh factor” (Rh for Rhesus); however, this protein is not found on the surface of Rhesus monkey RBCs. The human protein was renamed to “D antigen” over fifty years ago, but the original term and its connotations of a factor specifically shared between Rhesus monkeys and some humans have remained in use, despite the inaccuracy. The function of this protein was not immediately apparent, and there is a great deal of speculation on the implications of being Rh-negative versus Rh-positive. These include: nonhuman/extraterrestrial ancestors, associations with physical traits, high IQ,sensitivity to psychic/paranormal phenomena, and disease resistance. The sense that Rh-negative individuals are special persists despite the lack of scientific data. My goal in this article is to address various claims regarding being Rh-negative.

Associations between Rh-Negative Blood Type and physical Traits

Websites discussing the Rh-negative blood type have a general list of “known” associations: blue, green, or hazel eyes; red or reddish hair; low body temperature; low pulse; low (or high) blood pressure; extra rib or vertebrae; vestigial tail; larger than average head/forehead; unexplained body scars; unclonable blood; heightened senses; sensitivity to heat/sunlight; and the ability to disrupt electrical appliances. I have not found any scientific articles that corroborate these “known” associations. As I’ll demonstrate, a founder effect likely played a role in the greater proportion of Rh-negative individuals in European populations, and it is possible this also influenced the prevalence of other traits.

Read the complete article and many more in this issue of Skeptical Inquirer
Purchase options below
If you own the issue, Login to read the full article now.
Single Digital Issue May/Jun 17
 
$2.99 / issue
This issue and other back issues are not included in a new subscription. Subscriptions include the latest regular issue and new issues released during your subscription. Skeptical Inquirer
Annual Digital Subscription $16.99 billed annually
Save
5%
$2.83 / issue

This article is from...


View Issues
Skeptical Inquirer
May/Jun 17
VIEW IN STORE

Other Articles in this Issue


Editor’s Letter
Fake News and Fake Science in the Age of Misinformation
We could say that the whole reason the Skeptical Inquirer
NEWS AND COMMENT
Over 150 Scientific Organizations, Sixty-Two Nobel Laureates urge Repeal of Controversial Immigration Ban
The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) and
Chicken Acceleration? APA Puts Imprimatur on Credulous Psi Book
The 2017 publication of Transcendent Mind: Rethinking the Science of
Kazoo Magazine Aims to Encourage Girls in Science
A crowdfunding project has helped launch a new magazine, Kazoo,
Library Catalogs Deny Science Denial
Many libraries stock works such as Donald Prothero’s Reality Check:
Information Bias in Library Catalogs
Sanford Berman (see preceding News and Comment piece) has been
INTERVIEW
Still ‘Amazing’: A Conversation with James Randi
Part 2: The famous conjuror, investigator, and author—and founding fellow
INVESTIGATIVE FILES
Some Queensland Mysteries
Joe Nickell, PhD, is a former stage magician, private investigator,
A MAGICIAN IN THE LAB
It Just Never Stops …
James Randi began his career as a stage magician and
NOTES ON A STRANGE WORLD
The Return of the Fairies
Massimo Polidoro is an investigator of the paranormal, lecturer, and
THE SCIENCE OF SCIENCE COMMUNICATION
The Mindfulness Movement
How a Buddhist Practice Evolved into a Scientific Approach to Life
BEHAVIOR & BELIEF
Your Unlearning Report
Empathy Is Bad, You’re Not as Racist as You Thought, and Believing in Luck Won’t Help Your Golf Game
SKEPTICAL INQUIREE
Can Electromagnetic Fields Create Ghosts?
Benjamin Radford is a research fellow at the Committee for
FORUM
Science and History Get Personal
One of the oldest scientific societies in existence, The Royal
FEATURES
SURVIVING THE MIS INFORMATION AGE
For ourselves and our society, survival in the current era will require building our foundation on facts
Statin Denialism
The benefits of statins far outweigh their risks, but public perception has been skewed by alarmist misinformation from statin denialists
Vaccines, Autism, and the Promotion of Irrelevant Research: A Science-Pseudoscience Analysis
Proponents of the vaccination-autism link have created a bogus scientific debate by providing lists of studies that supposedly support their claims. In actuality, these studies are typically questionable or irrelevant. We identify this as its own developing pseudoscientific tactic: the promotion of irrelevant research
Helping Teachers Teach Evolution in the United States
The Teacher Institute for Evolutionary Science provides middle school science teachers with valuable science content and resources to improve evolution understanding in the United States
REVIEWS
Research into Astrology Made Accessible
Tests of Astrology: A Critical Review of Hundreds of Studies
Understanding Manufactroversies
Creating Scientific Controversies: Uncertainty and Bias in Science and Society
NEW AND NOTABLE
NEW AND NOTABLE
Listing does not preclude future review
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
It is disappointing to learn how “sluggish” stem cell re
THE LAST LAUGH
THE LAST LAUGH