U bekijkt momenteel de Netherlands versie van de site.
Wilt u overschakelen naar uw lokale site?
8 MIN LEESTIJD
[ REALITY IS THE BEST MEDICINE

An Explanation for Gulf War Illness

Harriet Hall, MD, also known as “The SkepDoc,” is a retired family physician, a CSI fellow, and an editor of the Science-Based Medicine blog. Her website is www.skepdoc. info. HARRIET HALL

When Iraq invaded Kuwait in 1990, a coalition of thirty-nine countries responded. A total of 382 American troops died. Those who survived deployments to the 1990–1991 Gulf War theater of operations and returned to the United States may have been safe from combat, but they were not “safe and sound.” Thirtyseven percent of them were suffering from a strange constellation of symptoms not seen in other locations or after previous wars. Around 250,000 individuals reported developing a chronic multisystem illness that was medically unexplained and persisted for years with little improvement.

They reported symptoms including fatigue, headache, memory problems, muscle/joint pain, diarrhea, dyspepsia/ indigestion, neurological problems, skin conditions, respiratory problems, and more. Previously known as Gulf War Syndrome, Gulf War Illness (GWI) cases have been difficult to classify. Two definitions have emerged: the Kansas definition and the CDC definition. The Kansas definition considers six symptom groups: fatigue and sleep problems, pain, neurologic and mood, gastrointestinal, respiratory symptoms, and skin symptoms. To qualify, patients must have symptoms in at least three of these categories that had developed during or after deploying to the Gulf War, and other conditions must be excluded. The CDC definition takes a symptom-category approach with three categories: fatigue, mood-cognition, and musculoskeletal. It requires symptoms in two of the three categories lasting six months or longer, and it includes a determination of severity. The Kansas definition is more specific and may be more appropriate for research settings, while the CDC definition is broader and may be more useful for clinical purposes.

Hieronder aankoopopties
Als je de uitgave bezit, Inloggen om het volledige artikel nu te lezen.
Enkele digitale editie Sept/Oct 2022
 
€3,49 / issue
Deze editie en andere oude edities zijn niet opgenomen in een nieuwe abonnement. Abonnementen omvatten de nieuwste reguliere uitgave en nieuwe uitgaven die tijdens uw abonnement zijn uitgebracht. Skeptical Inquirer
Jaarlijks digitaal abonnement SPECIALE AANBIEDING: Was €19,99 Nu €12,99 jaarlijks gefactureerd
Sla
38%
€2,17

Dit artikel komt uit...


View Issues
Skeptical Inquirer
Sept/Oct 2022
IN DE WINKEL BEKIJKEN

Andere artikelen in dit nummer


Columns
Skepticism’s Newly Recognized Relevance
Suddenly the things we skeptics have been warning
Jan. 6 Investigation Testimony Reveals Conspiracy-Riddled Trump White House
In June, the House committee investigating the January
Great Expectations: House Hearing on UAP Excites Fans, Offers Little Else
May 17, 2022, The House Intelligence Subcommittee on
Rumors on WhatsApp Lead to Mob Killings in Mexico
On Friday, June 10, 2022, thirty-oneyear-old Daniel Picazo,
Belgian Skeptics Group Wins Defamation Lawsuit
Website for Carl Van de Velde’s Training Institute,
‘I’m Not Superstitious, but I Am a Little Stitious’: Even Skeptics Cross Their Fingers
Just in time for 2022’s solitary Friday the
New Fitness ‘Poop Pill’ Promises Olympic-Level Results
There’s a new product supposedly meant to aid
Griffith Observatory Premiers Signs of Life Documentary
The Griffith Observatory in Los Angeles premiered its
Double Myster y: The Murder and Secret Life of ... Jack the Ripper?
Joe Nickell, PhD, has written treatises on old writings and writing materials as well as on detecting forged handwriting and artifacts. He has been involved in many famous cases.
The Dreams of Our Ancestors
Massimo Polidoro is an investigator of the paranormal, lecturer, and cofounder and head of CICAP, the Italian skeptics group. His website is at www.massimopolidoro.com .
A Different Take on E.O. Wilson
Massimo Pigliucci is the K.D. Irani Professor of Philosophy at the City College of New York. His books include Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science from Bunk (Chicago Press) and Philosophy of Pseudoscience (coedited with Maarten Boudry, Chicago Press). More by him at https://massimopigliucci.blog .
Is Autism Really a Spectrum?
Stuart Vyse is a psychologist and author of Believing in Magic: The Psychology of Superstition, which won the William James Book Award of the American Psychological Association. He is a fellow of the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry.
Skeptical Recurrence and Decay
Mick West is a writer, investigator, and debunker who enjoys looking into the evidence behind conspiracy theories and strange phenomena and then explaining what is actually going on. He runs the Metabunk forum, tweets @mickwest, and is the author of the book Escaping the Rabbit Hole.
Debunking ‘ Weapons of Mass Distraction’ Conspiracies
Benjamin Radford is a research fellow at the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry and author or coauthor of thirteen books, including Big—If True: Adventures in Oddity.
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR]
E.O. Wilson Thank you very much for your
Gallery
First James Webb Space Telescope Images
Far-field Galaxy Cluster and Most Distant Galaxies, New ‘Star Birth,' Stephan’s Quintet
Commentary
Critical Study of Nonsense Finally a Mainstream Concern
Editorial credit: Ron Adar / Shutterstock.com It
Interview
Rebooting Critical Thinking
Helen Lee Bouygues. Credit: The Reboot Foundation. Helen
Features
From Debunking to Prebunking
How Skeptical Activism Must Evolve to Meet the Growing Anti-Science Threat
How to Sell Pseudoscience
A great way to protect yourself against grifters and their snake oil is to learn the techniques they use to sell it. So let’s have some fun and pretend to sell bunk!
9/11 at 21: Perspectives in Light of the COVID-19 Pandemic
While the overall response to the 9/11 attacks was an overreaction, the critically delayed response to the far more deadly global pandemic has been an underreaction. Why?
Are Skeptics Wrong about the Value of Anecdotes?
Anecdotes can have an important role in science if the correct population for conclusions is identified and special care is taken about bias. They can even be utilized in formal testing of some skeptical hypotheses about anomalous phenomena.
Acknowledgments
My thanks to Valentin Popov and four anonymous
Reviews
Predictions—or Coincidences?
“Psays the jacket text on this remonitions are
NEW AND NOTABLE BOOKS]
Listing does not preclude future review.
Questioning the Quest for Immortality
In Greek mythology, Orpheus goes to the underworld
Follow Up
A Brief Response to Pigliucci’s Column on E.O. Wilson
This is a response to Massimo Pigliucci’s "The
Notable Guests in 2022
Now more than ever, people need to hear
Chat
X
Pocketmags ondersteuning