Sie sehen gerade die Germany Version der Website.
Möchten Sie zu Ihrer lokalen Seite wechseln?
131 MIN LESEZEIT

The Sputtering Engine of Creator Belief

GREGORY S. PAUL

This article was stimulated by two articles and a commentary in a recent issue that the author feels insufficiently noted dramatic declines in religious belief. He offers his arguments and analyzes the data on those declines in this article. Following it we present an extended comment from one of our original authors, James E. Alcock. —The Editors

In the September/October 2018 SKEPTICAL INQUIRER, three articles made related mistakes. One, by James Alcock, was based on the common belief that religion is highly popular and enduring because it is a natural consequence of the way brains work from childhood on up. Gregg

Davidson and company asserted that because little if any progress is being made concerning the popularity of creationist belief versus evolutionary science in the United States, effective methods must be urgently developed and deployed to improve the situation. Third, Lorence Collins stated that nearly half of Americans think our planet is just ten millennia old.

Lesen Sie den vollständigen Artikel und viele weitere in dieser Ausgabe von Skeptical Inquirer
Kaufoptionen unten
Wenn Sie die Ausgabe besitzen, Anmelden um den vollständigen Artikel jetzt zu lesen.
Digitale Einzelausgabe January/February 2019
 
€3,49 / issue
Diese Ausgabe und andere ältere Ausgaben sind nicht in einer neuen Abonnement. Das Abonnement enthält die letzte reguläre Ausgabe und die während des Abonnements erscheinenden neuen Ausgaben. Skeptical Inquirer
Digitales Jahresabonnement €19,99 jährlich abgerechnet
Speichern Sie
5%
€3,33 / issue

Dieser Artikel stammt aus...


View Issues
Skeptical Inquirer
January/February 2019
ANSICHT IM LAGER

Andere Artikel in dieser Ausgabe


Editor’s Letter
Cold Fusion to E-Cat: From Pathological Science to … Worse
It is hard to believe three decades have passed. This
THE MYTHS OF ENDLESS ENERGY
COLD FUSION Thirty Years Later
In March 1989, the claim of a revolutionary discovery in nuclear energy production galvanized the scientific community. It turned into a classic case of pathological science—and a textbook example of the self-correcting nature of science
Why E-Cat Is a Hoax
Energy Catalysis, or E-Cat, claims to generate nuclear energies on a tabletop—a scientifically impossible feat. Nonetheless, its inventor, Andrea Rossi, has fooled companies into investing in it
FEATURES
It Is Not the God Engine That Sputters ...
A Response to Gregory Paul
Screening for Prostate and Breast Cancer: It’s More Complex Than You May Think
Cancer screening searches for cancer before its symptoms appear. Messages encouraging screening for prostate and breast cancer are not only filled with misleading statistics, they also do not discuss the most significant harm of screening: being diagnosed and treated needlessly
PROFILE
Better Than Dumbledore
Have you ever wondered what it would be like if
RESEARCH REVIEW
Could Multiple Personality Disorder Explain Life, the Universe, and Everything?
Authors Bernardo Kastrup, Adam Crabtree, and Edward Kelly posed the
COLUMNS
Fringe Scientist Santilli’s Suit Against Dutch Astronomer Settled
An American fringe scientist sued an innocent astronomer on the
The New IPCC Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) special report released
Social Media–Fueled Child Abduction Rumors Lead to Killings
Misinformation is always problematic but can be especially malicious in
UK eHarmony Ads Banned for False Claims of Science
In January 2018, Britain’s Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) banned advertisements
Kraken: Monster of the Deep
Joe Nickell, PhD, is CSI’s senior research fellow. This year,
How to Be Skeptics 2.0 with the Help of … YouTube
Massimo Polidoro is an investigator of the paranormal, lecturer, and
Is Acupuncture Winning?
Harriet Hall, MD, also known as “The SkepDoc,” is a
Talking Science and Society at Church
Let’s Put Aside Differences to Tackle Society’s Biggest Challenges
‘Class A’ Bigfoot Report Reveals Little about the Beast—and Much about the Seekers
Benjamin Radford is a research fellow at the Committee for
[NEW AND NOTABLE
Listing does not preclude future review
The God Engine
I thoroughly enjoyed your article “The God Engine” in the
Rethinking Radiation and Nuclear Power
The article by Jeanne Goldberg is an essential contribution, not
Advocating Science to Religious Believers
The commentary by Davidson, Hill, and Wolgemuth recommends that the
Challenging Homeopathy
In the September/October issue, Kendrick Frazier describes comparison tests of
Creating an Apparition
The September/October issue of Skeptical Inquirer contains a three-page special
Readers’ Myopia on Pinker
Regarding the reader comments (Letters to Editor, September/October 2018) on
THE LAST LAUGH
REVIEWS
A Skeptical Guide through the Conspiracy Rabbit Hole
After devoting the past fifteen years to online conspiracy-fighting projects
What Are Contact ‘Experiencers’ Really Experiencing?
Beyond UFOs: The Science of Consciousness and Contact with Non-Human
Say It Isn’t So
Rigor Mortis: How Sloppy Science Creates Worthless Cures, Crushes Hope,
We Need to Put the Reproducibility Problem in Perspective
“Let us hope it is not true, but if it
Chat
X
Pocketmags Unterstützung