IT
  
Attualmente si sta visualizzando la versione Italy del sito.
Volete passare al vostro sito locale?
25 TEMPO DI LETTURA MIN

A Disproof of God’s Existence

THE TRADITIONAL DEFINITION OF GOD CREDITS HIM WITH three attributes: moral perfection, omniscience, and omnipotence. These are supposed to be logically independent, with none entailing the others. But that is not obviously correct: How is moral perfection possible without omniscience and omnipotence? How is it possible to be omnipotent without also being omniscient? Isn’t omniscience a type of omnipotence—a power to see and know everything? In fact, can’t we simply define God in terms of omnipotence, since his other attributes flow from this? If God is omnipotent he must be morally perfect, since he has the power to be morally perfect, and why would he not exercise that power? And if he is omnipotent he must be omniscient, since omniscience is an epistemic power. At the least he has the power to be both morally perfect and all knowing, given that he is allpowerful. Thus omnipotence seems to be basic in the definition of God. God differs from lesser beings precisely in having powers they do not have—moral powers, epistemic powers, and other powers (causing earthquakes, healings, etc.). God is replete with power, overflowing with it, by no means lacking in it. Any power there is, he has.

But is that right? Does God have every power? He has the power to create and destroy universes, but does he have the power to sneeze or digest food or pick his nose? Those powers require possession of a body with a certain anatomy, but God has no such body, being disembodied. Does he have the power to decay or split or emit radiation? How could he have these powers given his immaterial nature? Does he have the power to come down with a cold or be bed-ridden or have the runs? Surely not: God has the powers that are proper to his divine nature, not any old powers that things of other natures have—animals, plants, atoms. God essentially lacks certain powers as a condition of being who he is. He has the powers of a god not of a worm or cactus plant. Everything must lack something in order to be something, i.e., to have a determinate nature.

Sbloccate questo articolo e molto altro con
Si può godere di:
Godetevi questa edizione per intero
Accesso immediato a oltre 600 titoli
Migliaia di numeri arretrati
Nessun contratto o impegno
Prova per €1.09
ABBONATI ORA
30 giorni di accesso, poi solo €11,99 / mese. Disdetta in qualsiasi momento. Solo per i nuovi abbonati.


Per saperne di più
Pocketmags Plus
Pocketmags Plus

Questo articolo è...


View Issues
Skeptic
24.1
VISUALIZZA IN NEGOZIO

Altri articoli in questo numero


COLUMNS
The SkepDoc
Is Low-Dose Radiation Good for You? The Questionable Claims for Hormesis
The Gadfly
Define Your Terms (or, Here we Go Again)
ARTICLES
Making Gasoline from Water
John Andrews and the Invention of a Legend
Online Gaming
A Virtual Experiment in the Dark Side of Human Nature
Duped by Data Mining
DATA MINING INVOLVES RANSACKING DATA AND searching
How Science Will Explain and Fix Fake News
THE INSTANT, GLOBAL SPREAD OF INFORMATION through the
The Cult of Falun Gong
How this Group Raises Big Money Using a Dance Troupe and its Own Victimhood
The Opioid Epidemic Misunderstood
DRUG OVERDOSE IS NOW THE LEADING CAUSE OF death for
Why the Human- Centered View Has Not Served us Well
“Humanity takes itself too seriously. It is the world’s
Behe’s Last Stand
The Lion of Intelligent Design Roars Again
Straw Man on a Slippery Slope
The Case Against the Case Against Postmodernism
REVIEWS
Coddling Untruths
A Review of The Coddling of the American Mind: How Good Intentions and Bad Ideas are Setting Up a Generation for Failure by Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt
How to Know What’s Really Real
A review of The Skeptics’ Guide to the Universe: How to Know What’s Really Real in a World Increasingly Full of Fake, by Steven Novella with Bob Novella, Cara Santa Maria, Jay Novella, and Evan Bernstein.
What Are Ghosts, Anyway?
A review of Investigating Ghosts: The Scientific Search for Spirits by Benjamin Radford
Hoaxed!
Reviews of Bunk: The Rise of Hoaxes, Humbug, Plagiarists, Phonies, Post- Facts, and Fake News by Kevin Young and Hoax: A History of Deception: 5000 Years of Fakes, Forgeries, and Fallacies by Ian Tattersall and Peter Nevraumont
The Mead-Freeman Controversy 4.0
Review of Truth’s Fool: Derek Freeman and the War Over Anthropology by Peter Hempenstall.
CONTRIBUTORS
Michelle E. Ainsworth holds an MA in history. She enjoys
JUNIOR SKEPTIC
QUEST FOR THE TRUTH ABOUT DUNGEONS & DRAGONS
Today we’ll sharpen our pencils, pick up our magical
INVENTING WARGAMES
As we’ll learn, role-playing games (RPGs) such as Dungeons
PLUNGE INTO FANTASY
Strategy board games like Risk were complicated enough
A DARKER MAZE
It took a year to sell the first thousand Dungeons
THE SATANIC PANIC
Fear of Satanic cults trickled first through certain
D&D’s TRIUMPHANT RETURN
Eventually the Satanic Panic faded away. The FBI concluded
Chat
X
Supporto Pocketmags