Project Greenglow: How Horizon Lost the Message in the Medium |

Shopping Cart -

Your cart is currently empty.
Upgrade to today
for only an extra Cxx.xx

You get:

plus This issue of xxxxxxxxxxx.
plus Instant access to the latest issue of 300+ of our top selling titles.
plus Unlimited access to 26000+ back issues
plus No contract or commitment. If you decide that PocketmagsPlus is not for you, you can cancel your monthly subscription online at any time. Auto-renews at €10,99 per month, unless cancelled.
Upgrade Now for €10,99 Learn more
This website use cookies and similar technologies to improve the site and to provide customised content and advertising. By using this site, you agree to this use. To learn more, including how to change your cookie settings, please view our Cookie Policy
Pocketmags Digital Magazines
Pocketmags Digital Magazines
   You are currently viewing the Italy version of the site.
Would you like to switch to your local site?
Leggi ovunque Read anywhere
Modalità di pagamento Pocketmags Payment Types
Trusted site
A Pocketmags si ottiene
Fatturazione sicura
Ultime offerte
Web & App Reader
Loyalty Points

Project Greenglow: How Horizon Lost the Message in the Medium

When news media tailor their science reporting to their expected audiences, the message of science can get lost in the requirements of the medium. An episode of the BBC flagship science series Horizon offers an unfortunate example.

Several years ago, I acquired a recording of Sibelius’s fifth symphony. This is one of his best-known works, but the version I received was the original 1915 one rather than the revised 1919 version, which until fairly recently was the only recording ever heard. What I expected were minor changes in orchestration, with perhaps a few passages removed or extended here and there. What I got was the kind of shock you might feel if you met someone in the street you had known all your life and found that he was twenty centimeters taller than he was three weeks last Tuesday and that his hair had turned blue. When I cast a skeptical eye over newspaper, magazine, and television coverage of scientific topics, I often get much the same feeling.1

The medium is the message, a phrase coined in the 1960s by the Canadian philosopher Marshall McLuhan, became what was perhaps the most successful, and least understood, meme of the age. Arguments still rage about what McLuhan really meant, but it seems to me that he may at least have gotten it right about science reporting: the media decide what the message of science is, not the scientists. The requirement that TV science presentations keep the viewer entertained and tuned in means that they can easily wind up as a PR pitch for some supposed future technological miracle, while reality and the true nature of the science involved are largely ignored or obscured.

Purchase options below
Find the complete article and many more in this issue of Skeptical Inquirer - Jan Feb 2017
If you own the issue, Login to read the full article now.
Single Issue - Jan Feb 2017
Or 349 points
Getting free sample issues is easy, but we need to add it to an account to read, so please follow the instructions to read your free issue today.
Email Address
Annual Digital Subscription
Only € 3,16 per issue
Or 1899 points

View Issues

About Skeptical Inquirer

Stem Cell Research: Still Embattled after All These Years Science vs. Silliness for Parents: Debunking the Myths of Child Psychology Survey Shows Americans Fear Ghosts, the Government, and Each Other and much more..