GB
  
You are currently viewing the United Kingdom version of the site.
Would you like to switch to your local site?
26 MIN READ TIME

JonBenet Murder Mystery Solved? (Not by Psychics)

The death of six-year-old beauty queen JonBenet Ramsey went unsolved for two decades. Psychics were worse than useless, but the author’s proposed solution resulted from evaluating the best evidence.

On the day after Christmas 1996, child beauty-pageant star JonBenet Ramsey, age six, was found dead—garroted and her skull broken—in the basement of her family’s home in Boulder, Colorado. As police vied with the district attorney’s office over incompatible theories, the mystery of the little girl’s death became a national media sensation, but it never led to an arrest. The case is a complex puzzle—not only with many pieces to sort out and fit into place but with some bogus pieces tossed into the mix.

I have worked privately on this case over the years. Unfortunately, I lacked the direct access (to police files, crime-scene evidence, etc.) that I had when I was enlisted to investigate homicide cases (e.g., Nickell 2007; Nickell with Fischer 1992, 107– 129; Nickell and Fischer 1999, 39). Still, much essential evidence in the Ramsey case has now become publicly available.

What I present here is not an accusation but an exercise in trying to select and interpret the best evidence for “One of the greatest unsolved crimes in history” (Murder 2016).

Death of JonBenet

At about 5:52 am on December 26, the girl’s mother, Patsy Ramsey, called 911 to report her daughter missing— although a ransom note Mrs. Ramsey had found on the kitchen stairs warned that alerting authorities would result in her daughter being killed; ditto talking to anyone else, although she also called friends.

Responding to the emergency call, two police officers arrived separately at 755 Fifteenth Street and looked around, but they did not see any evidence of breaking and entering.

The ransom note was addressed to JonBenet’s father, John Ramsey (see below).

The patrol sergeant called for additional officers, a crime-scene investigation (CSI) crew, and what are known as victim advocates to com fort and assist the Ramseys. Unfortunately, the house was not vacated and guarded as a crime scene, and a Ramsey friend, Fleet White, even went looking in the basement. In a large room with a model railroad, he saw a broken window, picked up a piece of glass, putting it on the ledge, and moved a suitcase to look for other pieces. He had unthinkingly altered part of the crime scene (although it would be learned that John Ramsey had himself broken the window on an earlier occasion, when he had locked himself out of the house). Also, an advocate followed behind a fingerprint technician, using spray cleaner to tidy up as he finished with the area (Ramsey with Chapian 2012, 12; Thomas with Davis 2000, 18–27).

About one o’clock that afternoon, detective Linda Arndt initiated a further search with White and Ramsey. Ignoring her suggestion to begin at the top floor and work their way down, Ramsey headed straight for the basement, “a warren of rooms, closets, nooks, and crawl spaces” (Thomas with Davis 2000, 27). There, in a little room lacking a window, he discovered the lifeless body of JonBenet. She lay face up with her arms extended above her head. She was dressed in a white knit top and white long underwear over an “oversized” pair of floral-print panties. A pink nightgown was in the white blanket that she was neatly tucked into (Wecht and Bosworth 1998, 23; Thomas with Davis 2000, 28, 42; Douglas and Olshaker 2000, 284; Gentile and Wright 2003, 306). Ramsey ripped off duct tape covering her mouth, picked up the stiffened little body, and—carrying it upstairs—placed it on the floor close to the front door. Arndt noticed the smell of decomposition when she reached to the neck to feel for a pulse. Ramsey put a quilt over the body, and someone covered the feet with a sweatshirt. He lay down to put his arm around the dead child and stroked her hair, while Patsy came and fell across the body. All of these actions, and more, seriously compromised any future evidence collecting (Thomas with Davis 2000, 27–30; Wecht and Bosworth 1998, 22–26).

Mr. Ramsey,

Listen carefully! We are a group of individuals that represent a small foreign faction. We do respect your bussiness [sic] but not the country it serves. At this time we have your daughter in our posession [sic]. She is safe and unharmed and if you want her to see 1997, you must follow our instructions to the letter.

You will withdraw $118,000.00 from your account. $100,000 will be in $100 bills and the remaining $18,000 in $20 bills. Make sure that you bring an adequate size attaché to the bank. When you get home you will put the money in a brown paper bag. I will call you between 8 and 10 am tomorrow to instruct you on delivery. The delivery will be exhausting so I advise you to be rested. If we monitor you getting the money early, we might call you early to arrange an earlier delivery of the money and hence a [sic] earlier delivery pick-up of your daughter.

Any deviation of my instructions will result in the immediate execution of your daughter. You will also be denied her remains for proper burial. The two gentlemen watching over your daughter do not particularly like you so I advise you not to provoke them. Speaking to anyone about your situation, such as Police, F.B.I., etc., will result in your daughter being beheaded. If we catch you talking to a stray dog, she dies. If you alert bank authorities, she dies. If the money is in any way marked or tampered with, she dies. You will be scanned for electronic devices and if any are found, she dies.

Read the complete article and many more in this issue of Skeptical Inquirer
Purchase options below
If you own the issue, Login to read the full article now.
Single Digital Issue July August 2017
 
£2.99 / issue
This issue and other back issues are not included in a new subscription. Subscriptions include the latest regular issue and new issues released during your subscription. Skeptical Inquirer
Annual Digital Subscription £16.99 billed annually
Save
5%
£2.83 / issue

This article is from...


View Issues
Skeptical Inquirer
July August 2017
VIEW IN STORE

Other Articles in this Issue


Editor’s Letter
Te Fires of Creationists, and Rallying for Science
You have to hand it to the creationists, especially the
NEWS AND COMMENT
Academies Report Urges Bolstered Efforts to Protect Integrity of Science
The scientific enterprise places high value on honesty and openness
A Scientist Pushes Psychology Journals toward Open Data
The March 9 Nature reported some disturbing news: “An editor
Burzynski Sanctioned by Texas Medical Board
On March 3, 2017, the Texas Medical Board sanctioned Houston
Hans Rosling Brought Data to Life, Showed Our Misconceptions about the World
Many skeptics outside Sweden first encountered Professor Hans Rosling at
Humanities, Too: In New Study, History Courses in Critical Thinking Reduce Pseudoscientific Beliefs
We often think of the need for critical thinking in
INVESTIGATIVE FILES
Murder by Darkness: Does Mammoth Cave’s Specter Harbor a Secret?
Joe Nickell, a former magician and private detective, did graduate
A MAGICIAN IN THE LAB
The Farce Known as ‘FC’
James Randi began his career as a stage magician and
NOTES ON A STRANGE WORLD
The Monster of Florence: Case Closed?
The Terrifying Story of the Most Infamous Ritual Murders in Italian History, Part 1
THE SCIENCE OF SCIENCE COMMUNICATION
The March for Science
Partisan Protests Put Public Trust in Scientists at Risk
BEHAVIOR & BELIEF
Can Anything Save Us from Unintended Consequences?
Stuart Vyse is a psychologist and author of Believing in
SKEPTICAL INQUIREE
The Phoenix Driveway Ghost
Benjamin Radford is a research fellow at the Committee for
FEATURES
FIRE-BREATHING DINOSAURS?
Physics, Fossils, and Functional Morphology vs. Pseudoscience
DID AUSTRALIA’S ABORIGINES SEE PLESIOSAURS? YES-IN A CHILDREN’S BOOK
To support their claim that humans and plesiosaurs coexisted, antievolution publications cite as evidence a plesiosaur painting by an artist of the Kuku Yalanji tribe of Australia. However, the painting is actually a copy of an illustration in a 1960 children’s book on dinosaurs
‘Psychic Detective’ Noreen Renier: The Grinch Who Stole Christmas from a Grieving Family
August 12, 1989, was to be a joyous day for
The Danger of Chromotherapy
Despite the lack of scientific evidence for its effectiveness and its use of esoteric theories to describe its mechanisms of action, chromotherapy has become popular. But is it safe?
An Investigation of the Missing411 Conspiracy
In his “Missing411” series of books, author David Paulides claims that people are going missing from U.S. national parks under unusual circumstances and the National Park Service is obstructing attempts to investigate. What are the facts?
BALLES PRIZE
Maria Konnikova Wins CSI’s Balles Prize in Critical Thinking for The Confidence Game
In her acclaimed bestselling book The Confidence Game: Why We
REVIEWS
Why We Often Get Risks Wrong
Getting Risk Right: Understanding the Science of Elusive Health Risks
A Good Analysis of Bad UFO Information
By Robert Sheaffer. CreateSpace Independent Publishing, 2016. ISBN: 978-1519260840. 292
The Bigfoot Obsession
Monster Trek: The Obsessive Search for Bigfoot. By Joe Gisondi
NEW AND NOTABLE
[ NEW AND NOTABLE
Listing does not preclude future review
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
[ LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
Your March/April 2017 issue has provoked me to make an
THE LAST LAUGH
THE LAST LAUGH
Chat
X
Pocketmags Support