Shopping Cart -

Your cart is currently empty.
Continue Shopping
This website use cookies and similar technologies to improve the site and to provide customised content and advertising. By using this site, you agree to this use. To learn more, including how to change your cookie settings, please view our Cookie Policy
Pocketmags Digital Magazines
Pocketmags Digital Magazines
   You are currently viewing the Australia version of the site.
Would you like to switch to your local site?
Digital Subscriptions > Prospect Magazine > June 2017 > Back to cool

Back to cool

Fashions change, but one ideal has stayed in vogue for the best part of a century

In Straight From the Fridge, Dad, an authoritative dictionary of slang published in 2009, Max Décharné defines “cool” as “in the know, A-ok, hep,” and “unworried, calm… relaxed.” The musician and writer traces its origins to an effervescent jazz piece “How You Gonna Keep Kool?”, recorded by an obscure troupe called the Georgia Melodians in 1924. Almost a century separates then and now. Plenty of similar words have long since bitten the dust, from hep to hip, through groovy and fab, and on to wicked, phat and sick. But the notion of cool is still with us, expressed so often it goes unnoticed.

The rapper Jay Z replied to speculation about the gender of his unborn twins by saying: “Whatever God give me, I’m cool.” In 2014, London grime artist Stormzy admonished his rivals and detractors: “That is not cool, I can’t respect it.” Last year, Tove Lo, the pottymouthed Swedish pop star held up as the embodiment of female empowerment, released “Cool Girl,” a celebration of nostrings romance: “I’m a cool girl… Ice cold, I roll my eyes at you, boy.” In terms of its endurance and ubiquity, then, no pop-cultural word comes close. But what does “cool” really mean, where did it come from and how has it changed over the decades?

After those 1920s origins in jazz, the most crucial part of the cool story begins 20 years later, in the great upturning of cultural attitudes fomented by the Second World War. Tangled up in the same moment was a sea-change in the attitudes of many African-Americans, who wished to face the world in a spirit of self-possessed defiance. In his new book, The Origins of Cool in Postwar America, the cultural historian and academic Joel Dinerstein frames the crucial period as lying between 1943 and 1963, when “a new embodied concept and romantic ideal—being cool— emanated out of African-American jazz culture to become an umbrella term for the alienated attitude of American rebels.” “Cool” has, admittedly, always been given to occasional appropriation by less rebellious types as well. Back in 1924, the same year that the Georgia Melodians were doing their bit, the quiet, conservative US president Calvin Coolidge ran his election campaign under the slogan “Keep cool and keep Coolidge.” This was a something of an aberration. More generally, before the war and immediately after it, “being cool was an alternative success system combining wildness and composure… directly opposed to the social norms of a materialist and rapidly suburbanising society.”

Purchase options below
Find the complete article and many more in this issue of Prospect Magazine - June 2017
If you own the issue, Login to read the full article now.
Single Issue - June 2017
Or 799 points
Annual Digital Subscription
Only $ 6.50 per issue
Or 6499 points

View Issues

About Prospect Magazine

In Prospect’s June issue: Geoffrey Wheatcroft, Martha Gill and Helen Pidd examine the election chances of the three main political parties. Wheatcroft explores the Tories’ remarkable ability to rise from the ashes and assert dominance, Gill questions why the Lib Dem revival isn’t quite getting off the ground and Pidd examines Labour’s prospects after poor performances in the recent council and mayoral elections. Also in this issue: Christine Ockrent asks if France’s new President Emmanuel Macron can charm the parts of France that didn’t initially vote for him, AC Grayling assesses whether the rise and rise of drone warfare warrants a new ethical code for conflict and Francine Stock explores whether Pixar can continue to captivate modern audiences.