GB
  
You are currently viewing the United Kingdom version of the site.
Would you like to switch to your local site?
9 MIN READ TIME

The Gadfly

Are You in the 43 Percent?

I HAVE LONG BEEN FASCINATED BY HOW IT happens that some statistics make their way into the public conversation, taken for granted as being as reliable as pi— though if you gently blow on them, they disintegrate like dandelions. For example, Laura Kipnis, in her book Unwanted Advances, reports Edward Greer’s indefatigable investigation (in 2000) into the origins of the claim that that “only 2 percent of rape allegations are false”—a claim taken as undisputed in most Title IX investigations. Greer found that all roads led to Susan Brownmiller’s 1975 book Against Our Will. She got it from a judge’s speech given to the New York Bar Association in 1974; the judge apparently was quoting a newspaper account, written, Greer learned, by a reporter who was a friend and neighbor of Brownmiller’s.1 (In a previous column, I discussed a further complication in the 2 percent claim, namely that an allegation doesn’t have to be false—that is, an intentional lie—to be wrong, a result of honest but incorrect perceptions and memories.)

Once a number enters the public arena and serves ideological, political, or financial interests, you can’t dislodge it with a barge pole. I found one such number in an article by Kim Tingley in the “Studies Show” feature of the New York Times magazine. I was pleased to see at last that “studies show” that when it comes to sexual interest and responsiveness to erotic stimuli (i.e., porn), female brains and male brains are pretty much alike.2 The reporter seemed amazed at this discovery, given that “other studies show” that men have a greater sexual appetite than women and are more “attracted to pornography.” The article reflects the widespread assumptions that (1) women’s and men’s brains are wildly different, (2) women’s and men’s sexual drives are wildly different, and (3) if we can just observe what the brain is doing when it is looking at porn, stiletto heels, or photos of erotic partners we will somehow be able to intervene and fix any sexual problems the possessors 0of those brains might have. “If men’s and women’s brains respond similarly to sexual stimuli,” Tingley asks, “what accounts for the apparent differences in how they approach sexual practices?”

Unlock this article and much more with
You can enjoy:
Enjoy this edition in full
Instant access to 750+ titles
Thousands of back issues
No contract or commitment
Try for 99p
SUBSCRIBE NOW
30 day trial, then just £9.99 / month. Cancel anytime. New subscribers only.


Learn more
Pocketmags Plus
Pocketmags Plus

This article is from...


View Issues
Skeptic
24.4
VIEW IN STORE

Other Articles in this Issue


COLUMNS
The SkepDoc
Water Fluoridation: Public Health, Not Poison
Shroud of Turin Update
IN THE JULY 26, 2019 ISSUE OF PATHEOS, AN ONLINE newsletter
CONTRIBUTORS
Ástor Alexander is a figurative illustrator and painter.
COVER ARTICLE
Understanding Flat Earthers
REFLECTING UPON SOME STRIKING 2018 SURVEY findings
ARTICLES
The Girl Who Smelled Blue
The Colorful Case of Willetta Huggins
How to Navigate Contentious Conversations
THIS EXCERPT IS FROM OUR BOOK ABOUT HOW TO communicate
How Much Longer Will Cancer Screening Myths Survive?
IT HAS BEEN 20 YEARS SINCE DR. ANGELA RAFFLE published
Nationalistic Pseudohistory in the Balkans
MANY DIFFERENT TYPES OF PSEUDOHISTORY EXIST. One of
“Prove that I am Wrong!”
What QAnon, Descartes, and Brains in Vats Have in Common
DEBATE
Does God Exist?
A Rebuttal of Theologian Brian Huffling
God is Not a Moral Being
A Response to Gary Whittenberger on the Problem of Evil
REVIEWS
What is Mental Illness, Anyway?
A Review of Mind Fixers: Psychiatry’s Troubled Search for the Biology of Mental Illness by Anne Harrington
Stranger Danger
Review of The Human Swarm: How Tolerance of Strangers Creates Society by Mark W. Moffett
Darwin’s Apostles: The Battle Continues
A review of Darwin’s Apostles: The Men Who Fought to Have Evolution Accepted, Their Times, and How the Battle Continues, by David Orenstein and Abby Hafe.
Forensic Pseudoscience
Reviews of Forensic Science Reform: Protecting the Innocent, edited by Wendy J. Koen and C. Michael Bowers; The Psychology and Sociology of Wrongful Convictions: Forensic Science Reform, edited by Wendy J. Koen and C. Michael Bowers; and Blinding as a Solution to Bias: Strengthening Biomedical Science, Forensic Science, and Law, edited by Christopher T. Robertson and Aaron S. Kesselheim
JUNIOR SKEPTIC
VICTORIAN ENGLAND’S JURASSIC PARK
Hello!
AN UNSUSPECTED PAST
For many centuries, people thought they already knew
LOST WORLDS
That scientific revolution began in particular with
DISCOVERY OF DINOSAURS
Anning’s discoveries filled prehistoric oceans with
BRINGING DINOS TO LIFE
Today, everyone knows about dinosaurs. Most of us have
MONSTER BUILDING PROJECT
The Crystal Palace dinosaurs were something totally
BELLY OF THE BEAST
People were feverishly excited when the dinosaur park
CONFRONTING GIANTS
When the dinosaur park did finally open, crowds rushed
LEGACY OF THE DINOSAURS
The Crystal Palace building burned down in 1936. An
MONUMENT TO SCIENCE
HAWKINS DID NOT KNOW THAT THESE ANIMALS HAD TRIANGULAR
Chat
X
Pocketmags Support