AU
  
You are currently viewing the Australia version of the site.
Would you like to switch to your local site?
15 MIN READ TIME

Critical Thinking about Racism

—Kendrick Frazier

Racial issues continue to plague us. After every new incident (the deadly neo-Nazi march and confrontations with protestors in Charlottesville this past August a blatant example), we rehash all the arguments for how best to combat racism and racial division. In his introduction to our special section in this issue, Deputy Editor Benjamin Radford notes, “One thing that is missing from the debate is evidenced-based guidance on what psychology and sociology can teach us about what’s effective in reducing racism and prejudice.” Psychologists Craig A. Foster (with Steven M. Samuels), Stuart Vyse, and Terence Hines attempt to rectify that situation. They contribute short essays describing what research shows are the most effective—and least effective— ways to deal with racism. The research offers no guarantees but does give some hope that personal engagement and other innovative approaches can, sometimes, change some people’s minds.

We follow that with an article on the important research by Stanford University psychology professor and MacArthur Fellow Jennifer Eberhardt into subconscious racial bias. She doesn’t just carry out ground-breaking (and troubling) psychological experiments into how we perceive race. She works directly with local metropolitan police departments in sharing lessons learned and preparing strategies to avert conflicts and misunderstandings. As an assistant chief of the Oakland Police Department says, Eberhardt is almost embedded, attending staff meetings, giving feedback, tracking data, and providing training. Eberhardt’s research may be deeply disturbing in showing how prevalent unconscious bias is in almost all of us and how it seeps into almost everything. But she now focuses less on delineating the problem and more on finding solutions. “People need to have hope,” she says.

One key to her training struck me as especially constructive. It treats bias as a common human condition to be recognized and managed, rather than as a deeply offensive personal sin, and this makes police and others less defensive. Another police chief says her work “has really helped advance the discussions and put it in the framework of science, which takes a lot of the emotion out of it.”

Read the complete article and many more in this issue of Skeptical Inquirer
Purchase options below
If you own the issue, Login to read the full article now.
Single Digital Issue January February 2018
 
$4.49 / issue
This issue and other back issues are not included in a new subscription. Subscriptions include the latest regular issue and new issues released during your subscription. Skeptical Inquirer
Annual Digital Subscription $25.99 billed annually
Save
4%
$4.33 / issue

This article is from...


View Issues
Skeptical Inquirer
January February 2018
VIEW IN STORE

Other Articles in this Issue


NEWS AND COMMENT
Chapman Survey 2017: Advanced Ancient Civilizations, Spirits, Alien Visits Remain Top Paranormal Beliefs
The 2017 Chapman University Survey of American Fears came out
DNA Test: Dalí Not Father of Spanish Psychic
A DNA test confirmed that Maria Pilar Abel, a Spanish
Oceans of Data: New Ways to Measure Global Warming
Although scientists understand that the record of Earth’s surface and
‘Science Wars’ Veteran Latour Now Wants to Help Rebuild Trust in Science
Bruno Latour, the French sociologist who was a prime provocateur
‘Blue Whale’ Game Suicide Conspiracy Surfaces
Early in 2017, scary warnings circulated on social media asking
COMMENTARY
Why Pseudoscience Should Be Taught in College
The academic community doesn’t seem to take the spread of
INVESTIGATIVE FILES
The Giant Panda: Discovered in the Land of Myth
Joe Nickell, PhD, author of numerous books, including Entities and
NOTES ON A STRANGE WORLD
Myths and Secrets of the Colosseum
Massimo Polidoro is an investigator of the paranormal, lecturer, and
THE SCIENCE OF SCIENCE COMMUNICATION
Divided Expectations
Why We Need a New Dialogue about Science, Inequality, and Society
BEHAVIOR & BELIEF
Yes, We Do Need Experts
Stuart Vyse is a psychologist and author of Believing in
SCIENCE WATCH
Science (Indeed, the World?) Needs Fewer, Not More, Icons
Kenneth W. Krause is a contributing editor and “Science Watch”
SKEPTICAL INQUIREE
Is Elvis Presley in Home Alone?
Benjamin Radford is a research fellow at the Committee for
INTERVIEW
A Cancer Nurse Examines Alternative Medicine
“It’s the Equivalent of Murdering Somebody”
A SKEPTIC’S GUIDE TO RACISM
Critical Thinking Approaches to Confronting Racism
The racial divisiveness and tensions that erupted this past year
Psychology, Skepticism, and Confronting Racism
Racism is abhorrent. It is therefore easy for a movement
Combating Racism through Shared Goals
When my oldest child was in high school, the school
Are Racist Beliefs Pseudoscientific, and What Do We Do about Them?
One of the defining characteristics of a pseudoscience is nonfalsifiability
A Hard Look at How We See Race
Jennifer Eberhardt’s research shows subconscious connections in people’s minds between black faces and crime and how those links may pervert justice. Law enforcement officers across the country are taking note
FEATURES
In What Version of Evolution Do You Believe?
Despite our strong scientific understanding of organic evolution, many introduce unfounded beliefs to create a hybrid view of evolution that is unscientific and should not be taught in science classrooms
Daryl Bem and Psi in the Ganzfeld
Stuart Vyse’s (2017) article about Daryl Bem and p-hacking was
Medical Misinformation in the Media: Is Anorexia on the Rise?
Are eating disorders on the rise? One widely cited statistic claims so but falters under scrutiny. Here is a case study of flawed information presented by a prominent eating disorder information organization
Let’s be SHARPs Together: The Need for a New Umbrella Term
Two things that serve to maintain morale, focus, and motivation
Free Energy: When the Web Is Freewheeling
Claims about “free energy” are all over the Internet. What’s it all about? Not real science
REVIEWS
Jettisoning Freud’s Spurious Contributions
Freud, the Making of an Illusion, by American literary critic
The Interplay of Science Fiction and Pseudoscience
Pseudoscience and Science Fiction. By Andrew May. Springer, New York,
Repeating Erroneously the Words of Another
Hemingway Didn’t Say That: The Truth Behind Familiar Quotations. By
NEW AND NOTABLE
NEW AND NOTABLE
ALIENS: Past, Present, Future. Ron Miller. Author and illustrator Ron
FOLLOW UP
While Hurricanes Ravage the United States, Climate-Science Criticism Continues: An Exchange
The following letter is from a longtime member of the
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
Politicization of Scientific Issues
Although I was one of the good guys in getting
Fallacy Analysis Not Useful?
Thanks for Maarten Boudry’s “Fallacy Fork” (September/October 2017). He’s right:
Polygraph Problems
Glad to see James Randi’s unequivocal denunciation of the (so-called)
Evolution and Religion
Reading Matthew Nisbet’s column “Evolution in the College classroom” (September/October
Rose Mackenberg
In Terence Hines’s review of Tony Wolf’s book about Rose
Clash of Perspectives
In the letters column of the September/October SI, reader Norman
Erratum
The November/December 2017 issue of SI went to print omitting
[FEEDBACK]
The letters column is a forum on mat ters raised
THE LAST LAUGH
THE CIRCUS CLOWN TEST