Pocketmags Digital Magazines
AU
Pocketmags Digital Magazines
   You are currently viewing the Australia version of the site.
Would you like to switch to your local site?
70 MIN READ TIME

A Consistently Erroneous Technology

JAMES RANDI

James Randi began his career as a stage magician and escape artist but achieved fame as a professional skeptic, disproving the claims of self-described psychics, mind readers, and faith healers. He is a founder of the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry (formerly CSICOP ). Randi’s eleventh book, A Magician in the Laboratory, will be coming out soon.

I’ve often been asked to participate as an advisor in court cases or investigations where I might be useful due to my experience as a con-juror, but I have always refused when required to accept evidence obtained via the polygraph, or lie detector as it’s commonly known. However, if I were to be called upon to deny that this silly device is effective or dependable, I’d have no hesitation in doing so. The evidence is just so much against this technology, it’s difficult to believe how long it has existed as a supposedly valid notion.

Look at the history of so-called “lie detection.” The device itself is a nightmare of tubes, wires, electrodes, and moving styluses, something right out of a Bugs Bunny production. By measuring and displaying changes in the subject’s respiration, heart rate, blood pressure, skin conductivity, and other variables of the human body, a complex series of graph lines is generated, and a technician is—theoretically— able to decide whether the answers to a set of questions were honestly given or not. We need not get into more involved aspects of the procedure such as who comes up with the questions to be asked—though that is a matter of primary importance, of course. Let’s examine opinions of the “professionals” who should know.

Read the complete article and many more in this issue of Skeptical Inquirer
Purchase options below
If you own the issue, Login to read the full article now.
Single Digital Issue September October 2017
 
$4.49
This issue and other back issues are not included in a new Skeptical Inquirer subscription. Subscriptions include the latest regular issue and new issues released during your subscription.
Annual Digital Subscription $25.99 billed annually
Save
4%
$25.99

This article is from...


View Issues
Skeptical Inquirer
September October 2017
VIEW IN STORE

Other Articles in this Issue


Editor’s Letter
The concerns of scientific skeptics cover an astonishingly wide range
NEWS AND COMMENT
When a pollster that’s been surveying public opinion about evolution
Turkey already ranked even worse than the United States in
The first few months of 2017 have not been good
The Journal of Scientific Exploration (JSE) is one of the
INVESTIGATIVE FILES
Joe Nickell, PhD, is now well into his fifth decade
NOTES ON A STRANGE WORLD
The Terrifying Story of the Most Infamous Ritual Murders in Italian History, Part 2
THE SCIENCE OF SCIENCE COMMUNICATION
Facilitating Conversations about Science and Religion
BEHAVIOR & BELIEF
Stuart Vyse is a psychologist and author of Believing in
SKEPTICAL INQUIREE
Benjamin Radford is a research fellow at the Committee for
SPECIAL REPORTS
I trust that I need not persuade readers of Skeptical
In 2012, journalist John Bohannon of the respected journal Science
FEATURES
Looking through Galileo’s Lens or through the Imaginary Looking Glass
Souped-up galvanometers are being used to assess people’s health and determine what they supposedly need. Tests expose them as preposterous, and government agencies should stop their use
Why It’s Time to Get Rid of Fallacy Theory
During its history, the hairy man-beast has evolved through at least seven mythical embodiments
NEW AND NOTABLE
Listing does not preclude future review
REVIEWS
In this little red book, Don S. Lemons has assembled
President Trump—who has called climate change a “hoax” and has
Rose Mackenberg was a female private detective in the 1920s,
LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
“Surviving the Misinformation Age” (May/June 2017) offered my incredulous skeptical