BY MICHAEL SHERMER
(Originally published in the May 2018 issue of Scientific American)
WOULD YOU CUT OFF YOUR OWN LEG IF IT WAS THE only way to save another person’s life? Would you torture someone if you thought it would result in information that would prevent a bomb from exploding and killing hundreds of people? Would you politically oppress a people for a limited time if it increased the overall well-being of the citizenry? If you answered in the affirmative to these questions, then you might be a utilitarian, the moral system founded by English philosopher Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) and encapsulated in the principle of “the greatest good for the greatest number.”
READ MORE
Purchase options below
Find the complete article and many more in this issue of
Skeptic
-
23.3
If you own the issue,
Login to read the full article now.
|
Single Issue - 23.3
|
|
|
$7.99
Or 799 points
|
|
|
Annual Digital Subscription
Only $
5.75 per issue
|
SAVE
28%
|
|
$22.99
Or 2299 points
|
|
|
About Skeptic
SCIENCE AND MORAL VALUES
Jordan Peterson Phenomenon; Thought Crimes: Jordan Peterson and the meaning of the Meaning of Life; Special Section on Science & Morality. Getting Real About Right and Wrong; No, Being Religious Will Not Save You from Suicide; Lessons from Behavioral Science in a Warzone: How Reason, Skepticism, and Compassion Can Win Hearts and Minds; Moral Philosophy and its Discontents: Can science determine moral values? An Exchange with Massimo Pigliucci, Michael Shermer, and Kevin McCaffree; Facilitated Communication Redux: Persistence of a Discredited Technique; The Mystery of Elite Religious Scientists: A Cognitively Impenetrable Illusion; Five Questions About Human Errors for Proponents of Intelligent Design; The SkepDoc: Beware Stem Cell Clinics that Offer Untested Treatments; Junior Skeptic: Astral Projection